Ann: Introducing Vault Minerals, page-41

Good post, but don't expect facts to matter to those suffering from "Tonkin Delusion Syndrome", nor SLR panglossian's, nor RED "we could have been champions".
The very idea that shareholders (with very small holdings) opinions should have the same weight as (very) large shareholders is utterly ridiculous .
I called for the name change shortly after the merger was announced, when I realised it was a fait accompli. If a 1 for 10 share consolidation were also to be announced, that would complete phase one of Vault's existence, as it looks to become a tier 1 company with a long future .... and this will require further Leonora consolidation to happen ... till then the idea of squandering cash resources on "dividends" to appease small shareholders is ludicrous, and rest assured, Cool Hand will remain cool, and continue to ignore the libellous, ill informed, that suffer from historical amnesia and "facts" invention.
The RED thread, has become a pathetic Facebook like chat, that gives air to all sorts of conspiracy theories about RED, SLR, LT, gold suppression, and hackneyed old monetary theories etc etc .... and then if thats not enough, we get updates about their travels ... god give me strength.
VAU is an institutional grade stock, and will be run as such, so "small shareholders" get on board or get off, but please stop with the endless nonsense.