Jim Chalmers’ personal attack on Peter Dutton is bizarre and unwise, page-69

Wal for all your disparagement of the teal independents you have a right to hold your opinions.

I respectfully disagree.

I've read your posts for yonks old mate and accept that you are willing to perceive as you want to believe, just like me and everyone else.

I've been reading material from a wide range of science sources myself for over 30 years. I've searched out all the arguments that are suitable for taking as legitimate opposing opinion and learned a lot on the physics of both carbon and meteorology. I can't say I'm fully informed, but I am well-informed.

I recognise you've also read some science, how much I don't know, yet your slant is clearly negative and disparaging of science that disproves your beliefs, just like many of us.

I sense you're hungry for your pov to be accepted as the right way to understand the science. I don't believe there4 is a right way unless it starts with abandoning ones' own beliefs. we ned an open mind when reading, then questioning, science. scepticism is honestly being open to be proven wrong or right, without favour.

take this how you will. but I think you and I will have to agree to disagree - preferably without rancour.