Yes, OK. Assuming you're right, some percentage of the initial stake holders have sold their shares to the bag-holders here at a profit, this doesn't advance your narrative that AKP is some sort of vacuous profit-making scheme. After 11 or more years of slower than expected progress, it would be more remarkable if no initial funders had bailed. And your target as the principal mastermind of this very long running scheme, Fred Bart, keeps putting his own money in to keep the lights on. Why? So, many people have asked you why Fred does this and you have never given a satisfactory response. You just flip to: "What a fool you are, it's been so long and no product." The other point you dodge, or pretend isn't so, is that it is simply not the case that no progress has been made. The naysayers are like a broken record. They say AKP hasn't done X. "X is a problem it will never do X." Neck minute (year or two), AKP: "We've done X, now we're working on Y." Naysayer: "They're lying, the Chinese will steal it. They will never do Y." And on it goes....
Does that answer your point? If not, why not?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AKP
- Earth Mountain -Patents that will make AKP great again
Earth Mountain -Patents that will make AKP great again, page-107
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 63 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AKP (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
$6.20 |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $181.1M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
AKP (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable