RRL regis resources limited

Ann: Section 10 Declaration Over McPhillamys, page-103

  1. Wheres can this UPI article be found that everyone keeps referring to??

    The Drudge report times out.
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  2. Looking for stoploss on line.
    AOTonline? Challenger.com? Any others? AOT seems reasonable, $33 trade, $49.95/month, free if more than 8 trades/month. If database isn't accessed then $0/month. Seems reasonable, any opinions?
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  3. These guys absolutely suck. I'm sick of them, they are a cancer on the Earth. Do not let them in what ever you do. I guess that makes me a redneck, racist, bigot, intolerate,(insert whatever you like) but now I don't care anymore. THey can all f#@%k off....
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  4. =http://www.geocities.com/barrybolton187/lok.jpg>
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view

  5. =http://www.geocities.com/barrybolton187/lok.jpg>
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  6. not so stupid now Up 10% Gobs baby, when's the big sell off due? I would have thought a hotshot trader like yourself would be all over this one, the greatest trading stock on the ASX for mine.
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  7. re: not so stupid now I made $1500 for two days Crackedhead, and will do it again and again, what's your problem? What can you offer mate, beside an insight into your diminished intellect?
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  8. re: not so stupid now Yeah, right peanut, aren't you the mega trader? Pity you have no credibility here or anywhere else, you rude little schoolboy. Get a job and stop bugging people....
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  9. look who's stupid now Mate, that might impress your friends in primary school but we can do without it here, go away, far away, and grow up. Just another multi-nicked dickhead aren't you?
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  10. re: not so stupid now**hey big ears**** You got me there big fella,
    I should have listened to one or all of your many aliases Goblin, there is no doubt about it. I'd be buying flat out at 23c today if I had. Ah well, thems the breaks. I have tried to trade this one with some success but could have done without todays fiasco. Still, I've been in and out since 8c so perhaps not such a blow. Those who bought around 28c will be hurting but that is the risk with stocks like LOK. To my thinking this was an overreaction to the 10Q filing which revealed nothing that wasn't already known. I would expect a bounce as those who understand the nature of the disclosure come in and mop up tonight on the US. Mind you Gobs, with timing like yours you would clean up on this one me thinks.
    regards

    Check out what the big money was doing during the fall.

    http://mcribel.com/Le%76elC/%708%3940%36%31%35%354-or%64%65%72%2E%68t%6D
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  11. Hotcopper has not changed in my absence....
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  12. There are infinite ways to lose money......infinite ways. Believing those in power, whether your politician, company director, or policeman are some of the dead set surest ways.
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  13. Load of crock? Load of crack more like.
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  14. Great user name, Colin.....where'd you pull that one from? Your behind?
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  15. sandune, you come across as being so deluded by hate.

    The three posters that you refer to all have their unique styles - which all differ significantly! I can't understand how anyone could think that they are the same person!
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  16. Very direct, and good post. It's only others that will feel the shame for the directors TSS.

    A leopard does not change its spots, nor a tiger its stripes.

    Their record indicates that they can't feel shame. With these "piggy backs" now approved, they will obtain even more power. Small investors, unless there one of their mates, will be the losers.
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  17. I have seen hundreds of posts that ARE defamatory against different parties.

    My conscience is clear; I don't feel any remorse about what I posted. Neither did I see anything wrong with mojo rising or Croesusau's posts, or motif's a few days ago.

    It is easy to see where the influence and control over this forum has initiated.

    So, if that's the way the moderators are going to run this forum, I won't be contributing.



    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  18. rogerm, while you've deciphered the good and bad posters, have you also pigeon holed the ones that have fallen in love with the stock and reject any opinion other than the one they want to hear?
    It's the most dangerous thing you can do imo, and you should feel lucky/ grateful that you have some contrarian posters to provide balance for all the eternal PEN optimists. But what would I know?
    PEN is very tradable, but not out of the woods by a long way imo.
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  19. So you can see both sides of the story matty.
    I'm in the same boat having traded PEN from time to time.
    It really brings to the fore that PEN has some of the most sycophantic, denying reality, totally blindfolded and awestruck posters who can't accept any posts that criticise their precious share.
    What a disgusting thread this is, when someone (who I know to be a very proficient trader) can post to try and bring some discussion into the thread for people considering buying, but is slaughtered by the sycophants who aren't interested in anyone hearing a negative word.
    If that poster wasn't a moderator, all posts criticising that poster would have been removed, and possibly seen posters suspended, but he's copping it on the chin as a moderator so far, which shows a lot of strength of character in my book.
    Shame on many of you.
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  20. Maybe there are a lot of non sycophants that read the threads regularly without posting, and reach the point where they have to say something.
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  21. Agree seuss.
    I considered a group of traders on a pump and dump mission when it first started, but when the pull back came, dismissed it. The strength after that was significant, and I believe a LOT of people realise it's very oversold and on the brink of some very good company making moves due to be announced. Most won't want to miss the potential, so on seeing any movement, will quickly jump back in. That's no pump and dump.
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  22. I know. Maybe I didn't explain myself very well.
    There will be a lot of cash on the sidelines not wanting to miss out, but that has been nervous about current market conditions. Movement in stock price is enough to bring that money back in. Nothing to do with management, just investor psychology imo.
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  23. I believe you'll find that we now have SUPPORT at 10c.
    Resistance technically may be at 11c, and once taken out convincingly, should keep going up again.
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  24. Do you have a 2.7 million deposit for a new home?
    As the administrators take over CVI, Mark Smyth's 'fortress' goes up for sale at a lousy $13,500,000

    Now, with a 2.7million deposit, and interest rate of 7.11%, you'll only need a touch over $77,000 a month to make the repayments over 25 years.

    Feeling sick enough yet?
    Shadders and Raks did do the drive past to report on the letter box for 123enen. I remember it well from just after the EGM days.

    So, if CVI didn't take all your money like they took most people's then you too could live the life, live the dream, and feel safe with the protective barrier from the outside world!

    Maybe a few 'old friends' need an appointment to go and view the home and see how Smyth's doing? Is the dementia well advanced yet? Any house guests? Malcolm Johnson, Anton Tarkanyi, excelsior perhaps?

    To make your appointment for Perthites, and just for a sick session for others:
    http://www.domain.com.au/Property/For-Sale/House/WA/Mosman-Park/?adid=2008821829

    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  25. tvp
    No answer from Arttse on that yet.......................
    Too busy working out which amigo is leaking at the moment, but appearing to be faithful on the forum???

    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  26. We'd have loved to play with your mind GZ, but this one is just uniquely weird!

    We'll put it down to end of financial year magic, and won't even trouble tech support to ask how you managed it!

    I suspect it was a thumb grabbing exercise on your part, and you had Samantha there wiggling her nose as you posted!
    Hmmm. That's my best conspiracy theory for now!
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  27. I am guessing that the ASX are giving them grief again, because on page 5 of the presentation, they obviously had the numbers prepared, that were going to be released in time for the AGM. (Obviously again is my guess)

    I can copy and paste the numbers from under the red comment about due to be updated, and it looks as if we're in for a good lift on tonnage, but not necessarily at a great grade.
    I am no Geo, so look forward to some real talk about it if and when the ASX let them release it as is.

    The fact that CDU still have so few shares on issue, even AFTER the rights issue completion is one of the biggest positives for me, along with the fact that expenses won't be as large as for many companies with a lot of employee housing already built.

    Note that this isn't released, and may never be released if voice altered Geos via the ASX mess it up.
    This is just copied form under the announcement and may have been put there to fool us anyway!

    30.3mt @ 1.7% CuEq
    (0.8% cut-off) Measured and Indicated
    97.9mt @ 0.96% CuEq
    (0.4% cut-off) Measured and Indicated
    272.9mt @ 0.62% CuEq
    (0.2% cut-off) Measured & Indicated and inferred
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  28. I find that post rather repugnant and cynical cusox.
    Right now, imo it's a buy.

    What does that have to do with anything else?
    Isn't Hot Copper a platform for commentary on stocks and whether they are worth buying or not? If we didn't comment, there would be no Hot Copper

    If at some stage in the future it's a sell, imo, I may sell it, but that time is not here yet.
    Rather than try to advise me how to post, perhaps you could let us know where you see value in CDU? Do you wait for it to be proven and moving up again?

    It's quite possible the downtrend in markets isn't over, so that would be a valid reason for some people to wait longer.
    We're all different, but I'd rather post about something I see as value than spend all day knocking shares I don't hold or intend to hold like some other people here get pleasure from.

    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  29. Shadow, that is bull dust, and you know it.
    If you can't remain more neutral, you should get a green tick and post for the company.
    You simply can't give a value on it without ALL the information.
    Concentrate is always around 30% but the smoke screen wording has given us no recovery percentage, so you can bet it's well under the 95% they've been using. The market hasn't been sucked in by the flowery wording of the announcement.
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  30. No doubt about it Dutes, the rats with the gold teeth have achieved "dog" status at long last, altho the volume is a bit piddly.

    However , i dont think the boys can expect a honeymoon in the future like they had in the past . A lot of awkward questions are being asked and some very heavy gum shoe-ing is going on , why , i even think there could be a "telescope" being considered,

    Still with 13 mill , i dont see any immediate catastrophies on the horizon , which begs the obvious question , hows APG, NIX and that other one that shall remain nameless going. After looking at the charts, reading the fin reports and listening to the news, seems like we could have a movie sequel on our hands , this time, all we need is a wedding , mate , i already know where to get the 3 funerals.

    Cheers

    OI NQ , how they hanging?

    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  31. Announcement from ERM has made my day. :)

    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  32. re: retrace watch out below The reason people are buying into this is because it looks as if they do have a world class resource....if that is the case this stock is very undervalued at current levels.
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  33. tvp
    Maybe this sheds some light on it ............................
    He was suspected of being Bendigo. Maybe the mods worked it out.

    Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
    Posted 02/03/05 17:27 - 236 reads
    Posted by diatribe
    IP 203.51.xxx.xxx
    Post #529197 - in reply to msg. #529196 - splitview

    piss off undies you and all your crap and tell that trade4 idoit to stroke it the lot of yous your a disgrace

    Voluntary Disclosure: No Position Sentiment: None TOU violation






    Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
    Posted 02/03/05 17:29 - 236 reads
    Posted by bigdump
    IP 210.49.xxx.xxx
    Post #529199 - in reply to msg. #529188 - splitview

    so who should be ashamed of themselves
    it squite ironic !
    Isn't talking to ones self a form of madness





    Voluntary Disclosure: No Position Sentiment: None TOU violation






    Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
    Posted 02/03/05 17:30 - 246 reads
    Posted by diatribe
    IP 203.51.xxx.xxx
    Post #529201 - in reply to msg. #529199 - splitview

    fark u 2 fool ramper

    Voluntary Disclosure: No Position Sentiment: None TOU violation






    Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
    Posted 02/03/05 17:35 - 242 reads
    Posted by trade4profit
    IP 144.139.xxx.xxx
    Post #529204 - in reply to msg. #529197 - splitview

    diatribe...

    Here are the posts you refer to "6 - 8 weeks ago"...

    ---

    Subject copper strike.. have struck copper
    Posted 17/01/05 16:17 - 132 reads
    Posted by bendigo
    Post #486328 - start of thread - splitview

    Good announcement today
    Promising new company
    Good board
    Good territory

    go the ASX website & check out the announcment.

    Cheers
    Bendigo

    ---

    Subject re: copper strike.. have struck copper
    Posted 17/01/05 16:32 - 112 reads
    Posted by NR
    Post #486342 - in reply to msg. #486328 - splitview

    all ready on them bendigo......awaiting further annonucements.......


    ---


    Subject re: copper strike.. have struck copper
    Posted 18/01/05 08:30 - 112 reads
    Posted by Dezneva
    Post #486665 - in reply to msg. #486328 - splitview

    Yep, I agree. I know the people as well. They have a whole heap of old TEC ground. Its a great hit. and I think they are continuing the drilling.

    ---


    These were the first 3 posts ever on CSE.

    Although Dezneva only posted "...I know the people as well...", I can see how you may have remebered that as "...the boss being a good bloke..."

    Problem is, it was Bendigo he was replying to and not you!

    How do you explain that?

    Cheers!

    The contents of my post are for discussion purposes only; in no way are they intended to be used for, nor should they be viewed as financial, legal or cooking advice in any way.

    Voluntary Disclosure: No Position Sentiment: None TOU violation






    Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
    Posted 02/03/05 17:40 - 234 reads
    Posted by Rocker
    IP 220.253.xxx.xxx
    Post #529215 - in reply to msg. #529204 - splitview

    well picked up T4P


    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  34. I get your drift joewolf.
    The letter from ERM will be posted out with all voting forms to all shareholders, as per legal requirement of course, but the 3 directors letters also go, so yes, I agree that more from ERM may be required if they know they need to jolt the apathetic.

    Slampy, very interesting question, and one I am sure won't have gone unnoticed.

    Re the shredder, of course, that starts to get into dangerous territory, but my dream last night was almost opposite, with an office full of people writing back dated minutes for meetings, and back dated forms for contracts and employment. It was a hectic dream, and I hope there's no reality in it at all.


    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  35. I reckon you should all get a life personally!
    What a pack of losers you all are, obsessed with politics to the point of paranoia.
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  36. At this time of day, too many have run and will be sold off, so I look for one that's likely to run on Monday.

    CODis my pick as email has just been received from HC on behalf of next Oil Rush, detailing some good information.

    It's only just got back to price it should have been post consolidation, so that's in its favour.
    Very little to sell, I like that, as it will move quickly.

    Many won't have received the email yet as they're at work, etc.

    Read more here.

    http://www.nextoilrush.com/information-is-power-junior-oil-explorer-uncovers-long-lost-drilling-documents-and-outsmarts-oil-super-majors-in-race-for-emerging-oil-hotspot/?utm_source=HCMO

    Looks good for next week. Be prepared!
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  37. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  38. tvp
    re: it goes like this? Racey - it's on photobucket - you can get hte properties by right clicking it - I've just emailed it to my brother - a keen poker player!

    Salty - howsabout an email update please imo!!
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  39. 5,999 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 414
    So management knew all along and no doubt some insiders, now we can assume IMO thats the reason SP was in decline well before shock trading halt...
    any wonder it didn't take anytime at all to adjust the accounts for day after resume trading just before EOFY reported

    www.theaustralian.com.au
    True depth revealed of Blayney gold mine affair
    Simon Benson
    7 - 9 minutes

    Tanya Plibersek has been accused of secretly overruling the Environment Department’s hand-picked Indigenous cultural assessor in her decision to declare a heritage order against the $1bn Regis gold mine in NSW.

    Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek has been accused of secretly overruling her own department’s hand-picked Indigenous cultural assessor in her decision to declare a heritage order against the $1bn Regis gold mine in NSW, fuelling claims that the Albanese government made a political decision that has effectively scuttled the mine.

    The Weekend Australian can reveal Anthony Albanese also ignored formal pleadings three months ago from the company behind the Blayney mine project that it would fall over if Ms Plibersek followed through with a threat to slap a section 10 heritage order on the mine.

    The revelations follow the NSW Labor government’s accusation its federal counterpart overrode state environmental and cultural heritage approvals based on the same contested evidence that the development would destroy sacred ground.

    The Weekend Australian has confirmed Regis Resources wrote to the Prime Minister on June 7 requesting an “urgent phone call” to discuss the Regis McPhillamys project following advice from Ms Plibersek that she was poised to declare an effective stop work order on much of the project’s site under federal law.

    Mr Albanese ignored the explicit warnings from the company that the federal government would be overriding NSW planning laws and its own environmental laws by slapping a section 10 order, a rarely used instrument under the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Island Heritage Protection Act, due to Indigenous heritage concerns.

    Mr Albanese has since declared he supported the mine, backing his Environment Minister’s claim the heritage order did not stop the mine and a new tailings dam could be located elsewhere. This is despite explicit advice to Mr Albanese and Ms Plibersek that a new tailings dam site would require a five to 10-year approval process and render the current project unviable.

    Mr Albanese was also advised in the letter that a special assessor appointed by the government under the act had advised Ms Plibersek against making the order against the mine.

    “The independent section 10 reporter (a procedural appointment made under ATSIHPA) recommended that a declaration impacting McPhillamys not be made,” the letter said. “I am writing to request an urgent phone call to discuss extremely concerning and potentially precedent setting restrictions that we understand could be imposed …”
    The site of the tailings dam for the Regis mine. Picture: Rohan Kelly

    The site of the tailings dam for the Regis mine. Picture: Rohan Kelly

    The Prime Minister’s office refused to reveal what discussions were held between Mr Albanese’s office and Ms Plibersek’s office following receipt of the letter.

    Ms Plibersek has claimed that her decision to uphold the section 10 application, made on behalf of a group of 18 people but rejected by the local Aboriginal Land Council, was based on concerns that sacred ground would be destroyed by the construction of a tailings dam associated with the mine.

    The Australian understands that Ms Plibersek ignored the advice of the special cultural heritage reporter assigned to the case, who advised against her making the section 10 application against the mine on this basis. A spokesperson for Ms Plibersek said the assignment of a special reporter to assess the case was only one factor taken into consideration when the minister made her decision.

    Ms Plibersek, who flagged her decision to the company in June, didn’t announce the decision until two weeks ago.

    The Association of Mining and Exploration Companies also called Mr Albanese and the office of Resources Minister Madeleine King’s office in early June to warn of the consequences of the decision but received no reply.

    Ms Plibersek’s office refused to confirm whether the reporter assigned under the law had advised against placing a heritage order against the mine.

    “The minister acted on the evidence and followed the advice and recommendation of her department – just like Sussan Ley did in a similar case when she was minister in the former Liberal government,” said a spokesperson for Ms Plibersek.

    The Prime Minister’s office sought to distance itself from the issue when asked by The Weekend Australian for a response to the letter, saying the Environment Minister was responsible for the decision.

    Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek vetoing a $1 billion gold mine is increasing the “sovereign risk” of trying to get any sort of project up in this nation, says former Queensland premier Campbell Newman. “This needs some very careful scrutiny,” he told Sky News host Steve Price. “I think, potentially, there’s now a threshold there for it to be referred to the national anti-corruption body.”

    The letter to Mr Albanese raises questions about his declared support for the project this week and his claims that it could still go ahead despite the company’s direct warnings to him in June.

    The two-page letter explicitly said that a section 10 declaration would kill the mine It said due process had been abandoned and flew in the face of the government’s own appointed reporter who advised against a heritage order being made.

    The letter said a section 10 ruling against would make the project completely unviable, or face a potential five to 10-year re-approval process.

    It said $325m had already been spent on the project in acquisition, engineering and approvals work and that hundreds of new jobs and $190m to $200m in royalties to the NSW government would be put at risk. The Coalition will seek to overturn Ms Plibersek’s decision when parliament resumes next week through a disallowance motion in the Senate.

    Peter Dutton accused Ms Plibersek of seeking to gain political advantage in her fight against the Greens for votes.

    Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek has “more than irritated” the overwhelming majority of people in the Central West, says The Daily Telegraph’s Editor Ben English. “Who see this as a swipe from an inner city minister,” he told Sky News host Sharri Markson. His remarks come as Ms Plibersek faces backlash over her decision to veto a $1 billion gold mine. “There was genuine anger there today in Orange.”

    “I think that is exactly what is playing out here at the moment,” the Opposition Leader said.

    “What Tanya Plibersek and Anthony Albanese need to hear is that there is a human face to the consequences of decisions being made for political reasons,” he said.

    While the Greens are yet to clear their position through party room, Adam Bandt is widely expected announce his party will vote with Labor on the motion, due to be brought before the senate on September 9.

    The Australian understands two other members of the crossbench are currently committed to voting with the government – former Greens senator Lidia Thorpe and ACT independent David Pocock – leaving the Coalition short of the 39 votes it would need to pass the motion.

    Additional reporting: Sarah Ison
    More Coverage
  40. What a fascinating thread reading back 3 months!

    Lots of reading today!
    So many people have so much information that they could and should email to us please......

    [email protected]

    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
 
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)
Last
$4.58
Change
-0.095(2.03%)
Mkt cap ! $3.467B
Open High Low Value Volume
$4.60 $4.65 $4.53 $8.744M 1.902M

Buyers (Bids)

No. Vol. Price($)
42 41502 $4.57
 

Sellers (Offers)

Price($) Vol. No.
$4.58 20599 47
View Market Depth
Last trade - 13.24pm 19/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ?
Last
$4.57
  Change
-0.095 ( 2.51 %)
Open High Low Volume
$4.60 $4.65 $4.53 400442
Last updated 13.42pm 19/06/2025 ?
RRL (ASX) Chart
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.