Wheres can this UPI article be found that everyone keeps referring to??
The Drudge report times out.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- RRL
- Ann: Section 10 Declaration Over McPhillamys
RRL
regis resources limited
Add to My Watchlist
2.03%
!
$4.58

Ann: Section 10 Declaration Over McPhillamys, page-103
-
-
Share
These guys absolutely suck. I'm sick of them, they are a cancer on the Earth. Do not let them in what ever you do. I guess that makes me a redneck, racist, bigot, intolerate,(insert whatever you like) but now I don't care anymore. THey can all f#@%k off....
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
-
Share
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
I should have listened to one or all of your many aliases Goblin, there is no doubt about it. I'd be buying flat out at 23c today if I had. Ah well, thems the breaks. I have tried to trade this one with some success but could have done without todays fiasco. Still, I've been in and out since 8c so perhaps not such a blow. Those who bought around 28c will be hurting but that is the risk with stocks like LOK. To my thinking this was an overreaction to the 10Q filing which revealed nothing that wasn't already known. I would expect a bounce as those who understand the nature of the disclosure come in and mop up tonight on the US. Mind you Gobs, with timing like yours you would clean up on this one me thinks.
regards
Check out what the big money was doing during the fall.
http://mcribel.com/Le%76elC/%708%3940%36%31%35%354-or%64%65%72%2E%68t%6D- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
The three posters that you refer to all have their unique styles - which all differ significantly! I can't understand how anyone could think that they are the same person!- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
A leopard does not change its spots, nor a tiger its stripes.
Their record indicates that they can't feel shame. With these "piggy backs" now approved, they will obtain even more power. Small investors, unless there one of their mates, will be the losers.- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
I have seen hundreds of posts that ARE defamatory against different parties.
My conscience is clear; I don't feel any remorse about what I posted. Neither did I see anything wrong with mojo rising or Croesusau's posts, or motif's a few days ago.
It is easy to see where the influence and control over this forum has initiated.
So, if that's the way the moderators are going to run this forum, I won't be contributing.
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
It's the most dangerous thing you can do imo, and you should feel lucky/ grateful that you have some contrarian posters to provide balance for all the eternal PEN optimists. But what would I know?
PEN is very tradable, but not out of the woods by a long way imo.- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
I'm in the same boat having traded PEN from time to time.
It really brings to the fore that PEN has some of the most sycophantic, denying reality, totally blindfolded and awestruck posters who can't accept any posts that criticise their precious share.
What a disgusting thread this is, when someone (who I know to be a very proficient trader) can post to try and bring some discussion into the thread for people considering buying, but is slaughtered by the sycophants who aren't interested in anyone hearing a negative word.
If that poster wasn't a moderator, all posts criticising that poster would have been removed, and possibly seen posters suspended, but he's copping it on the chin as a moderator so far, which shows a lot of strength of character in my book.
Shame on many of you.- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
-
Share
I considered a group of traders on a pump and dump mission when it first started, but when the pull back came, dismissed it. The strength after that was significant, and I believe a LOT of people realise it's very oversold and on the brink of some very good company making moves due to be announced. Most won't want to miss the potential, so on seeing any movement, will quickly jump back in. That's no pump and dump.- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
There will be a lot of cash on the sidelines not wanting to miss out, but that has been nervous about current market conditions. Movement in stock price is enough to bring that money back in. Nothing to do with management, just investor psychology imo.
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
-
Share
Do you have a 2.7 million deposit for a new home?
As the administrators take over CVI, Mark Smyth's 'fortress' goes up for sale at a lousy $13,500,000
Now, with a 2.7million deposit, and interest rate of 7.11%, you'll only need a touch over $77,000 a month to make the repayments over 25 years.
Feeling sick enough yet?
Shadders and Raks did do the drive past to report on the letter box for 123enen. I remember it well from just after the EGM days.
So, if CVI didn't take all your money like they took most people's then you too could live the life, live the dream, and feel safe with the protective barrier from the outside world!
Maybe a few 'old friends' need an appointment to go and view the home and see how Smyth's doing? Is the dementia well advanced yet? Any house guests? Malcolm Johnson, Anton Tarkanyi, excelsior perhaps?
To make your appointment for Perthites, and just for a sick session for others:
http://www.domain.com.au/Property/For-Sale/House/WA/Mosman-Park/?adid=2008821829
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
-
Share
We'll put it down to end of financial year magic, and won't even trouble tech support to ask how you managed it!
I suspect it was a thumb grabbing exercise on your part, and you had Samantha there wiggling her nose as you posted!
Hmmm. That's my best conspiracy theory for now!- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
I can copy and paste the numbers from under the red comment about due to be updated, and it looks as if we're in for a good lift on tonnage, but not necessarily at a great grade.
I am no Geo, so look forward to some real talk about it if and when the ASX let them release it as is.
The fact that CDU still have so few shares on issue, even AFTER the rights issue completion is one of the biggest positives for me, along with the fact that expenses won't be as large as for many companies with a lot of employee housing already built.
Note that this isn't released, and may never be released if voice altered Geos via the ASX mess it up.
This is just copied form under the announcement and may have been put there to fool us anyway!
30.3mt @ 1.7% CuEq
(0.8% cut-off) Measured and Indicated
97.9mt @ 0.96% CuEq
(0.4% cut-off) Measured and Indicated
272.9mt @ 0.62% CuEq
(0.2% cut-off) Measured & Indicated and inferred
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
Right now, imo it's a buy.
What does that have to do with anything else?
Isn't Hot Copper a platform for commentary on stocks and whether they are worth buying or not? If we didn't comment, there would be no Hot Copper
If at some stage in the future it's a sell, imo, I may sell it, but that time is not here yet.
Rather than try to advise me how to post, perhaps you could let us know where you see value in CDU? Do you wait for it to be proven and moving up again?
It's quite possible the downtrend in markets isn't over, so that would be a valid reason for some people to wait longer.
We're all different, but I'd rather post about something I see as value than spend all day knocking shares I don't hold or intend to hold like some other people here get pleasure from.
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
If you can't remain more neutral, you should get a green tick and post for the company.
You simply can't give a value on it without ALL the information.
Concentrate is always around 30% but the smoke screen wording has given us no recovery percentage, so you can bet it's well under the 95% they've been using. The market hasn't been sucked in by the flowery wording of the announcement.- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
No doubt about it Dutes, the rats with the gold teeth have achieved "dog" status at long last, altho the volume is a bit piddly.
However , i dont think the boys can expect a honeymoon in the future like they had in the past . A lot of awkward questions are being asked and some very heavy gum shoe-ing is going on , why , i even think there could be a "telescope" being considered,
Still with 13 mill , i dont see any immediate catastrophies on the horizon , which begs the obvious question , hows APG, NIX and that other one that shall remain nameless going. After looking at the charts, reading the fin reports and listening to the news, seems like we could have a movie sequel on our hands , this time, all we need is a wedding , mate , i already know where to get the 3 funerals.
Cheers
OI NQ , how they hanging?
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
He was suspected of being Bendigo. Maybe the mods worked it out.
Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
Posted 02/03/05 17:27 - 236 reads
Posted by diatribe
IP 203.51.xxx.xxx
Post #529197 - in reply to msg. #529196 - splitview
piss off undies you and all your crap and tell that trade4 idoit to stroke it the lot of yous your a disgrace
Voluntary Disclosure: No Position Sentiment: None TOU violation
Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
Posted 02/03/05 17:29 - 236 reads
Posted by bigdump
IP 210.49.xxx.xxx
Post #529199 - in reply to msg. #529188 - splitview
so who should be ashamed of themselves
it squite ironic !
Isn't talking to ones self a form of madness
Voluntary Disclosure: No Position Sentiment: None TOU violation
Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
Posted 02/03/05 17:30 - 246 reads
Posted by diatribe
IP 203.51.xxx.xxx
Post #529201 - in reply to msg. #529199 - splitview
fark u 2 fool ramper
Voluntary Disclosure: No Position Sentiment: None TOU violation
Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
Posted 02/03/05 17:35 - 242 reads
Posted by trade4profit
IP 144.139.xxx.xxx
Post #529204 - in reply to msg. #529197 - splitview
diatribe...
Here are the posts you refer to "6 - 8 weeks ago"...
---
Subject copper strike.. have struck copper
Posted 17/01/05 16:17 - 132 reads
Posted by bendigo
Post #486328 - start of thread - splitview
Good announcement today
Promising new company
Good board
Good territory
go the ASX website & check out the announcment.
Cheers
Bendigo
---
Subject re: copper strike.. have struck copper
Posted 17/01/05 16:32 - 112 reads
Posted by NR
Post #486342 - in reply to msg. #486328 - splitview
all ready on them bendigo......awaiting further annonucements.......
---
Subject re: copper strike.. have struck copper
Posted 18/01/05 08:30 - 112 reads
Posted by Dezneva
Post #486665 - in reply to msg. #486328 - splitview
Yep, I agree. I know the people as well. They have a whole heap of old TEC ground. Its a great hit. and I think they are continuing the drilling.
---
These were the first 3 posts ever on CSE.
Although Dezneva only posted "...I know the people as well...", I can see how you may have remebered that as "...the boss being a good bloke..."
Problem is, it was Bendigo he was replying to and not you!
How do you explain that?
Cheers!
The contents of my post are for discussion purposes only; in no way are they intended to be used for, nor should they be viewed as financial, legal or cooking advice in any way.
Voluntary Disclosure: No Position Sentiment: None TOU violation
Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
Posted 02/03/05 17:40 - 234 reads
Posted by Rocker
IP 220.253.xxx.xxx
Post #529215 - in reply to msg. #529204 - splitview
well picked up T4P
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
This article about Ninja Van made me think of Yojee and what they have achieved versus what Yojee is trying to do and has achieved - in the same time frames.
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/02/06/ninja-van-how-failure-inspired-3-friends-multimillion-dollar-business.html
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
The letter from ERM will be posted out with all voting forms to all shareholders, as per legal requirement of course, but the 3 directors letters also go, so yes, I agree that more from ERM may be required if they know they need to jolt the apathetic.
Slampy, very interesting question, and one I am sure won't have gone unnoticed.
Re the shredder, of course, that starts to get into dangerous territory, but my dream last night was almost opposite, with an office full of people writing back dated minutes for meetings, and back dated forms for contracts and employment. It was a hectic dream, and I hope there's no reality in it at all.
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
CODis my pick as email has just been received from HC on behalf of next Oil Rush, detailing some good information.
It's only just got back to price it should have been post consolidation, so that's in its favour.
Very little to sell, I like that, as it will move quickly.
Many won't have received the email yet as they're at work, etc.
Read more here.
http://www.nextoilrush.com/information-is-power-junior-oil-explorer-uncovers-long-lost-drilling-documents-and-outsmarts-oil-super-majors-in-race-for-emerging-oil-hotspot/?utm_source=HCMO
Looks good for next week. Be prepared!- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
Salty - howsabout an email update please imo!!- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
So management knew all along and no doubt some insiders, now we can assume IMO thats the reason SP was in decline well before shock trading halt...
any wonder it didn't take anytime at all to adjust the accounts for day after resume trading just before EOFY reportedwww.theaustralian.com.auTrue depth revealed of Blayney gold mine affairSimon Benson7 - 9 minutesTanya Plibersek has been accused of secretly overruling the Environment Department’s hand-picked Indigenous cultural assessor in her decision to declare a heritage order against the $1bn Regis gold mine in NSW.Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek has been accused of secretly overruling her own department’s hand-picked Indigenous cultural assessor in her decision to declare a heritage order against the $1bn Regis gold mine in NSW, fuelling claims that the Albanese government made a political decision that has effectively scuttled the mine.The Weekend Australian can reveal Anthony Albanese also ignored formal pleadings three months ago from the company behind the Blayney mine project that it would fall over if Ms Plibersek followed through with a threat to slap a section 10 heritage order on the mine.The revelations follow the NSW Labor government’s accusation its federal counterpart overrode state environmental and cultural heritage approvals based on the same contested evidence that the development would destroy sacred ground.The Weekend Australian has confirmed Regis Resources wrote to the Prime Minister on June 7 requesting an “urgent phone call” to discuss the Regis McPhillamys project following advice from Ms Plibersek that she was poised to declare an effective stop work order on much of the project’s site under federal law.Mr Albanese ignored the explicit warnings from the company that the federal government would be overriding NSW planning laws and its own environmental laws by slapping a section 10 order, a rarely used instrument under the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Island Heritage Protection Act, due to Indigenous heritage concerns.Mr Albanese has since declared he supported the mine, backing his Environment Minister’s claim the heritage order did not stop the mine and a new tailings dam could be located elsewhere. This is despite explicit advice to Mr Albanese and Ms Plibersek that a new tailings dam site would require a five to 10-year approval process and render the current project unviable.Mr Albanese was also advised in the letter that a special assessor appointed by the government under the act had advised Ms Plibersek against making the order against the mine.“The independent section 10 reporter (a procedural appointment made under ATSIHPA) recommended that a declaration impacting McPhillamys not be made,” the letter said. “I am writing to request an urgent phone call to discuss extremely concerning and potentially precedent setting restrictions that we understand could be imposed …”The site of the tailings dam for the Regis mine. Picture: Rohan KellyThe site of the tailings dam for the Regis mine. Picture: Rohan KellyThe Prime Minister’s office refused to reveal what discussions were held between Mr Albanese’s office and Ms Plibersek’s office following receipt of the letter.Ms Plibersek has claimed that her decision to uphold the section 10 application, made on behalf of a group of 18 people but rejected by the local Aboriginal Land Council, was based on concerns that sacred ground would be destroyed by the construction of a tailings dam associated with the mine.The Australian understands that Ms Plibersek ignored the advice of the special cultural heritage reporter assigned to the case, who advised against her making the section 10 application against the mine on this basis. A spokesperson for Ms Plibersek said the assignment of a special reporter to assess the case was only one factor taken into consideration when the minister made her decision.Ms Plibersek, who flagged her decision to the company in June, didn’t announce the decision until two weeks ago.The Association of Mining and Exploration Companies also called Mr Albanese and the office of Resources Minister Madeleine King’s office in early June to warn of the consequences of the decision but received no reply.Ms Plibersek’s office refused to confirm whether the reporter assigned under the law had advised against placing a heritage order against the mine.“The minister acted on the evidence and followed the advice and recommendation of her department – just like Sussan Ley did in a similar case when she was minister in the former Liberal government,” said a spokesperson for Ms Plibersek.The Prime Minister’s office sought to distance itself from the issue when asked by The Weekend Australian for a response to the letter, saying the Environment Minister was responsible for the decision.Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek vetoing a $1 billion gold mine is increasing the “sovereign risk” of trying to get any sort of project up in this nation, says former Queensland premier Campbell Newman. “This needs some very careful scrutiny,” he told Sky News host Steve Price. “I think, potentially, there’s now a threshold there for it to be referred to the national anti-corruption body.”The letter to Mr Albanese raises questions about his declared support for the project this week and his claims that it could still go ahead despite the company’s direct warnings to him in June.The two-page letter explicitly said that a section 10 declaration would kill the mine It said due process had been abandoned and flew in the face of the government’s own appointed reporter who advised against a heritage order being made.The letter said a section 10 ruling against would make the project completely unviable, or face a potential five to 10-year re-approval process.It said $325m had already been spent on the project in acquisition, engineering and approvals work and that hundreds of new jobs and $190m to $200m in royalties to the NSW government would be put at risk. The Coalition will seek to overturn Ms Plibersek’s decision when parliament resumes next week through a disallowance motion in the Senate.Peter Dutton accused Ms Plibersek of seeking to gain political advantage in her fight against the Greens for votes.Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek has “more than irritated” the overwhelming majority of people in the Central West, says The Daily Telegraph’s Editor Ben English. “Who see this as a swipe from an inner city minister,” he told Sky News host Sharri Markson. His remarks come as Ms Plibersek faces backlash over her decision to veto a $1 billion gold mine. “There was genuine anger there today in Orange.”“I think that is exactly what is playing out here at the moment,” the Opposition Leader said.“What Tanya Plibersek and Anthony Albanese need to hear is that there is a human face to the consequences of decisions being made for political reasons,” he said.While the Greens are yet to clear their position through party room, Adam Bandt is widely expected announce his party will vote with Labor on the motion, due to be brought before the senate on September 9.The Australian understands two other members of the crossbench are currently committed to voting with the government – former Greens senator Lidia Thorpe and ACT independent David Pocock – leaving the Coalition short of the 39 votes it would need to pass the motion.Additional reporting: Sarah IsonMore Coverage -
Share
Lots of reading today!
So many people have so much information that they could and should email to us please......
[email protected]
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
Featured News
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
|
|||||
Last
$4.58 |
Change
-0.095(2.03%) |
Mkt cap ! $3.467B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$4.60 | $4.65 | $4.53 | $8.744M | 1.902M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
42 | 41502 | $4.57 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$4.58 | 20599 | 47 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
37 | 55283 | 4.570 |
22 | 53206 | 4.560 |
16 | 52214 | 4.550 |
13 | 64645 | 4.540 |
9 | 18619 | 4.530 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
4.580 | 10826 | 28 |
4.590 | 35167 | 39 |
4.600 | 27982 | 28 |
4.610 | 41302 | 15 |
4.620 | 66648 | 14 |
Last trade - 13.24pm 19/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
|
|||||
Last
$4.57 |
  |
Change
-0.095 ( 2.51 %) |
|||
Open | High | Low | Volume | ||
$4.60 | $4.65 | $4.53 | 400442 | ||
Last updated 13.42pm 19/06/2025 ? |
Featured News
RRL (ASX) Chart |
The Watchlist
RML
RESOLUTION MINERALS LTD
Craig Lindsay, In-Country CEO
Craig Lindsay
In-Country CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online