high court rolls howard again, page-16

  1. 4,223 Posts.
    the howard government tried to silence criticism by NGOs (aid/watch being one of them) by cancelling their charitable status:

    "NGOs can help provide a voice for disadvantaged people in society, a crucial aspect of a democratic society.[4] However, this role has been threatened, with the attitudes of previous governments ranging from apathy to outright hostility. The previous Howard Government was particularly hostile towards advocacy NGOs in all areas, for criticising government policy, and sought to exclude NGOs deemed too political from charitable status, which allows them to offer tax-deductible donations. The removal of charitable status can drastically reduce an NGO?s funding, as donor foundations are only able to donate to NGOs because of their tax-deductible status.[5]"

    http://aidwatch.org.au/where-is-your-aid-money-going/non-government-organisations/what-is-an-ngo

    the High court has now determined that this form of political censorship is unconstitutional

    i wonder how many other howard government "laws" will follow into the cesspit of history
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.