Lithium Related Media Articles, page-24336

Absolutely agree that it can't be a biased echo chamber and there have been valuable contributors who are on the negative side, though they don't hang around long unless they have a vested interest. That said, if someone has a long history of trolling particular stocks and spreading FUD with no valuable data or insights then they should be ignored. There are people hurting at the moment and these people with no morals (or just paid shills?) keep on kicking them when they're down. Weird how they coincidently disappear once things go well though... I'd put people who continually and knowingly misunderstand what a ramp up period is in this FUD bucket. Know anyone like this?