͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏
Mining Could Be the Only Boom Left on the Road to
Net Zero
By Nick Hubble
Editor, Strategic Intelligence Australia
Dear
If you ask me, it’s impossible. And politicians know it’s impossible. But that doesn’t mean they won’t try to reach net zero anyway.
The real question for investors is how they’ll try to do it. And then how to benefit accordingly.
That was my theory, anyway. Until this week. Because Bloomberg claims to have found the answer. But it’s too terrifying to invest in.
We can achieve net zero after all, claims Bloomberg. We just need to put the entire global economy on “a war footing” to do so.
This might sound like a sensationalist headline. But they weren’t kidding. They called the piece ‘The Brutal Economics of Reaching Net Zero’ for a reason.
A lot of reasons, actually. And they are brutal for investors, car owners, holidaymakers and anyone who likes air conditioning.
You and I might read the list of sacrifices that must be made on the altar of net zero and conclude that net zero is doomed to fail. Bloomberg’s journalists closed their eyes, wiggled their noses, bent over backwards and stood on their head to reach the opposite conclusion.
We must do whatever it takes to save the planet. And whatever it takes is going to be seriously painful.
Read on and you’ll discover you shouldn’t be worried about the value of your stocks and bonds. You should be worried about your basic living standards, democracy and human rights.
Environmental masochism will ruin us
Consider the financial cost of net zero, just for a start…
‘In 2022 the global consulting firm McKinsey & Co. found that businesses, governments and households worldwide need to put forward a total of $275 trillion between now and 2050, peaking in the near term at 8.8% of global gross domestic product.
‘A new report from the BloombergNEF research group pegs the price of achieving net zero lower than McKinsey did, though still at a mind-boggling $215 trillion.’
Who is going to pay up?
One thing I’m sure of. It won’t be the corporate sector:
‘[…] the needed injection of new money amounts to $3.5 trillion per year on average, roughly equivalent to half of all corporate profits worldwide, say, or a quarter of all tax revenue.’
(It’s not clear whether this includes the profits and tax revenue generated by the fossil fuel producers which would be put out of business.)
Either way, good luck getting the bill for net zero past the corporate lobbyists running the government.
And for those of you who think we live in a squeaky-clean democracy, with a government run for the people, by the people and of the people, things don’t look much better…
Who would vote to save the planet?
When people discover the implications of trying to reach net zero, they’re unlikely to support it any longer.
We’d need to install a Manhattan-sized solar park nearly every day. And spend a trillion US dollars on wind per year.
We’d need to get rid of fossil fuel cars. And I’m sure you’ve seen on the news how EV sales are faring lately…
No doubt you’ve seen news of transmission grids getting rejected by locals and environmentalists. Well, to reach net zero, we’d need to expand grid cables by about 2 million kilometres…each year.
Don’t worry about the view outside your kitchen window though. The grid rollout won’t happen. Given that such projects can take 15 years to get off the drawing board, the annual rollout needed to hit targets in the remaining years becomes an absurdity.
The cost is equally wild:
‘The IEA estimates an annual price to upgrade the grid of more than $600 billion by this decade’s end; BNEF, working with an alternative net-zero scenario, foresees $800 billion in yearly outlays by then.’
But this is my favourite bit of Bloomberg’s maths:
‘The IEA gives more weight to behavioral changes such as driving and flying less or turning down the thermostat, noting these “achieve demand reductions rapidly and at no cost.”’
Yes, the loss of your living standards come at ‘no cost’. What a relief that is…
Unless, of course, you like living.
It’s not just Bloomberg who’s run the maths and concluded dystopia is what it takes to save the planet.
The Australian economist Steve Keen has made a name for himself calculating what it’d take to reach net zero too. His conclusions were even more alarming than Bloomberg’s.
Then there was the FIRES group of universities. They estimated what an “absolute zero” scenario would look like. If we don’t manage to offset or go carbon neutral on existing energy demand, what does our world look like?
We wouldn’t be able fly or ship goods, for a start…
All this might sound pretty awful. But when you’re trying to save the planet, anything goes.
There is only one ray of hope remaining for investors…
Advertisement:
An Important Update
on ‘NOT ZERO’Last September 2023, we released a controversial energy expose, titled ‘NOT ZERO’
We said:
‘There’s a big energy U-turn coming. Anti-fossil fuel policies could soon be scrapped. Investment in mining exploration will likely skyrocket. Commodity prices will soar.
And oil and gas stock prices could go vertical.’
It was spot on.
The U-turn is happening all over the world. Green policies are getting scrapped. Oil and gas stocks are on the rise.
Now, we’re releasing a CRITICAL UPDATE to the Not Zero thesis.
Because there’s a new ‘tipping point’ that could send oil and gas stocks back up...
All advice is general advice and has not taken into account your personal circumstances. Please seek independent financial advice regarding your own situation, or if in doubt about the suitability of an investment.
Connect with us on social media:
All content is © 2024 Fat Tail Investment Research Pty Ltd All Rights Reserved.
Fat Tail Daily is committed to protecting and respecting your privacy. We do not rent or share your email address. By submitting your email address, you consent to Fat Tail Investment Research delivering daily email issues and advertisements.
Calculating your future returns: Never invest more than you can afford to lose and keep in mind the ultimate risk is that you can lose whatever you’ve invested. While useful for detecting patterns, the past is not a guide to future performance. Some figures contained in this report are forecasts and may not be a reliable indicator of future results.
If you have any questions, click here to contact us.
Fat Tail Investment Research
387 City Rd, South Melbourne, VIC 3205Tel: 1300 667 481
+61 3 9115 9000 if calling from outside Australia
