I'm certainly not in 'the know' with regards to what would have produced this difference. However could it possibly just be the contingency funds? i.e. previously they were just quoting the funding costs to get it all operational and not providing for any contingency funds. I understand this does not equal exactly $3 mill but could possibly explain it?
Either way, we won't know for sure unless big finchy comes clean.
As long as the trend of continual re-evaluation and upping of the capex doesn't continue any further, still think were in a great position to be taking advantage of a reasonable margin in 12-24 months time.
The DFS is what we need asap, particularly that first word, definitive.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- TRF
- games games games
games games games, page-8
Featured News
TG1
TechGen Metals kicks off airborne geophys survey at Sally Downs copper play – a first for the permit
KAI
Pilbara Minerals buys land off Kairos part of its York gold project for $20M – and a 2% royalty on any PLS gold sales