That’s a right way to do, we need evidence to show whether this is a good technology rather than saying good without supporting evidence or just quoting from social media.
I can not find conclusion of this study. There’s no comparison between patients with and without cystic fibrosis either.
a lot of studies have been conducted but never been published or mentioned after started. similarly a lot of contracts were signed but no numbers of cases were reported or no income was reported. we can only see the beginning but no end or outcome, we need follow up in the news rather than CR news all the time. Don’t tell me those studies have been stopped because no funding is available.
I have to ask again: is the technology working at all? How good is it?
Research, page-2919
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 16 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add 4DX (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
65.5¢ |
Change
0.210(47.2%) |
Mkt cap ! $256.5M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 58.0¢ | 65.5¢ | 53.0¢ | $3.801M | 6.340M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50000 | 65.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 65.5¢ | 16554 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 14.02pm 27/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| 4DX (ASX) Chart |