Is Jesus God?, page-544

  1. 5,038 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 1
    My point that you keep ignoring is very important. It's not appropriate to change certain verses in the standard Bibles to have a completely different meaning. It's evil.

    The standard Bibles denounce the Unitarian view outright. The Christian belief as per the said Bibles is that the Word was God in the beginning and the Word was with God in the beginning and it is not a simple misinterpretation, nor is it based on obscure passages. It is not open to debate or change. This theme is pervasive and emphasised in the standard Bibles in many ways in the NT. The Interlinear Greek verses corroborate all that.

    You can't use the Greek in the NT to replace the translated English words to accommodate your Unitarian view because by doing so you are corrupting the standard English Bibles.

    As such you are treating them as though they are wrong and hence you reject them. By all means use another English Bible but leave the standard ones alone. They are not for you to corrupt to suit your Unitarian view. Nor can they be corrupted and used to suit other Unitarian views that are equally false, such as the JWs who have gone to the trouble of corrupting them by writing their own Bible, the NWT.

    Last edited by starcluster: 29/09/24
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.