I dont quite know how you can say this is not a material issue - you've been saying on this very board that Rim has great recoveries and great potential for atmospheric leaching. I quote the below from your own post:
"Also the high recovery rates, such as the 90% recovery through acid leaching reported at these deposits, are significant. This level of recovery can compensate for lower scandium grades, enhancing the feasibility"
So on one hand you trump the 90% recovery indicating it is commercial and "can compensate for lower scandium grades", then you say Rimfire was not misleading in presenting the 90% recovery as potentially commercial in the heading and highlights of their announcement.
So which is it? A/ Misleading information and you making a mistake a result ? B/ Not really great news economically for the project ? or C/ both A/ and B/ ?
