Up Ramping No Factual Yes

I find it both ridiculously disingenuous of down rampers that are intentionally trying to push the price down by scaring investors off and not buying and holding long.

Why do I say both myself and posters Bob alleges are not ramping because it is **based on factual analysis** and a reasoned assessment of upcoming events and the company's underlying fundamentals, rather than speculative hype or unfounded optimism.

1. Upcoming Legal Outcome

The Supreme Court hearing is a **real, tangible event** that has been publicly disclosed. The analysis here revolves around the potential impact of a successful ruling, which is a common and legitimate consideration for investors when evaluating stock movements. It’s not baseless speculation but an **event-driven** outlook.

2. Factual Drilling Results

The references to Rimfire’s **drilling results** from Murga North and Melrose are **verifiable facts**. The mention of 21 million tonnes of scandium-bearing material and the upcoming resource upgrade isn’t hyped-up information; it’s based on **actual exploration outcomes** that the company has already disclosed to the market. Investors are being reminded of the significance of these results, which provide a **strong foundation** for future growth.

3. Market Demand for Scandium

The commentary around scandium’s role in **high-tech industries** like aerospace and green energy is backed by industry trends. There’s growing global demand for scandium, and major companies like **Rio Tinto** are indeed investing in the space.

The **strategic importance** of scandium is recognized by experts, and Rimfire’s positioning in this niche is factual, not speculative.

4. Potential Share Price Movements

The possibility of the share price rising to 15 or 20 cents is framed as a potential outcome, tied to **specific, upcoming catalysts**—namely, the legal decision and subsequent resource upgrade. It’s not a claim that these price levels are guaranteed, but rather a projection based on how markets often react to **reduced uncertainty** and **positive news**

.5. Encouraging Due Diligence

Suggesting that people watch the Supreme Court live hearing is an invitation for investors to **stay informed and make their own judgments**, rather than blindly following speculative tips.

I encourage due diligence given this is the opposite of ramping, which typically seeks to manipulate without regard for underlying facts.

Bob this is not ramping because it is grounded in **real events**, **factual data**, and **market trends**, while offering a reasoned view of potential outcomes based on the company’s **fundamentals** and the impact of the legal decision. It’s an analysis designed to inform, not artificially inflate the stock price.