"birth of tzl", page-12

Crusty I agree with your sentiments in the main. However I should also point out that it is not actually a matter of choice for Mark Bouris to put his name on the prospectus, it is more a matter of corporate regulations that a chairman has to sign off on the prospectus.
I also agree with BD that the steady as she goes attitude is unlikely to be the best course of action in the technology world when things moves a lightning speed. If TZ continues to slumber on, its technology would be surpassed. I also do not buy the argument that because TZ owns so many patents that it is protected or immune to competition as a lot of their patents do not appear to have commercial implication even in the medium term.
Is is somewhat fortuitous, or because of the work of Chris Kelliher that Anxiter sign on as when they did for TZL.
Part of the workings of a listed company is to bring to the attention of the investments markets the presence of the company, in this case TZL. In this regard, I do not believe and the evidence would support my view that management has even enough. Mark please bring fort a greater willingness to publicize TZ rather than relegating it to a step son status in favour of your YBR. KT with all due respect just does not cut the mustard in the investment world currently.