Moderation has flipped into censorship, page-6

Not as far as I know - I seriously doubt it. HC is not big enough and nothing in their reports suggest such modelling.

Nor as far as I know either. I am questioning. But also pointing out that my question is not a solitary question in that roaminoz - a former mod who in my experience was good at it. Actually suggested an AI.

Also from time to time I do read updated terms and conditions and I believe read some changed wording that would have allowed (obvioulsy allowed is not the same as committing to) for AI moderation if it was deemed ready or good enough - AND if I recall correctly there is no requirement for management to inform posters AI is being used or test - but nor is there any restrictions on us asking that as a question.

I think they've even taken their feedback forum off

And the test area as well seems to have been restricted - if I wanted to see if post post button processing was occuring on my posts I could try and post the same post to a test section and find out often that the same post wasn't hanging on hitting the post button there.

In this MKT forum - there aren't a lot of threads - but one that there is has a post and linked artical describing the market herald as a small telecommunications player but with substantial numbers or users and visits - that accords very well with my understanding - and so - I think it might be a very good test bed for say Google or an analytics player to try to test AI moderation with the consent and partnership of the MKT business ownership if they wanted to do that.


https://support.hotcopper.com.au/hc/en-us/requests/new

Yes - that's an option.

Do you happen to know if madmin is still on the management or any part of the business?