@Maverick7
....with this;...
...but then lost me with these;...
"
Was hoping not to post anymore, ..."
Trust me, there are a lot of folks, including management who were hoping the same.
Want proof re management?
If your opening remarks don't fit, "...along these lines.", then what does?
"...
there is a lot of misinformation being spread by holders who have no idea what they are talking about."
When first encountered, I thought there was at least a degree of IQ here, but regarding the above - if that is NOT an oxymoron then tomorrow is yesterday!
How can one spread misinformation unless they know what they are talking about?
You are not getting away with,
Oh well they are just repeating falsehood. That's repeating, not spruiking.
"...
won't respond to personal attacks, motives, etc...."
"...
just clarifying some of the misinformation being posted."
How privileged of you to set the rules.
Ok for you to call the shots, but not for others as per the attack quoted below - a slur and accusation of intent;....
"
- As someone who seems to be considered the resident "expert" on this stock, suggest you understand and post accurate information so as not to mislead others.."
" ...
I suggest holders who can stomach contrary opinions read his posts."
You certainly may, but I'll bet many others will not be heeding your advice to listen to holders they have on ignore. I know I will not.
However, since you're in a sharing mood, permit me offer some wisdom gleaned from this exercise, about the value of post from non holders on this public forum.
But first a caveat; occasionally there are non holders who
contribute because of an association, ie, they remotely have skin in the game and therefore a vested interest - what benefits us benefits them and sometimes vice versa.
On the whole, the majority of non holder post are agenda driven either financially or what most would regard as due to a mental anomaly, but rarely have relevance and therefore mostly have zero value, for the simple basic fact that, like the government, their hand is in someone else's pocket - not their own.
Their post are like shouts from the gallery at a murder trial decided by jury. The jury is instructed to hear testimony from the witnesses (with skin in the trial), disregarding all others. The judge hears the jury verdict and then passes the sentence.
To be fair to you, I do think that this slipped through the cracks;...
"-
The lab will pulverise each metre received and perform analysis."
That is still insignificant, just like it is a bit of a stretch to think anyone will make financial decisions based on whether it was 2000m of sample sent to labs, or 20m.
"...
I'm not a shorter as I can't get borrow, ..."
Okay,I trust you.
Now trust me, that your accounts are being hacked, so send me all your passwords and I'll secure your data for you.
Just like no one was listening to the Hollywood tribe beating the Harris drum, I doubt anyone here that matters, is marching to yours.
Cheerz
(20min delay)