Share
8,657 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 26
clock Created with Sketch.
12/11/24
17:54
Share
Originally posted by pintohoo:
↑
20 or 30 years shouldn't be a problem - the system by then would be mature but, for the potential deficit period - which could be around 2035 ish - and for ?? who knows how many years - probably not many I'm reluctant to use the word 'taxpayers' ------------ I'd rather say the country or the nation - yep will be on the block as you say ------- if there is a deficit in power ----- it won't cost billions to supply the deficit - that will be impossible to purchase to fill the gap ------- but, it will COST billions in losses. The market is only interested in one kind of thing - solar and wind, with a scattering of hydro where it stacks up not nuclear, not coal and doubtful on much gas - because there isn't the gas atm all that easily. Markets will go with whatever makes profit and is doable. Nuclear isn't doable for that time period where there might be a shortage , coal is not doable because it's not politically doable so, it really comes down to investment decisions on return on capital and what's doable - and that's solar and wind - with the odd bit for hydro - but even on the latter - it's longer term and larger capital - so, it's just not as attractive hence - solar and wind = guaranteed profit no one cares about the country - it's all just about $
Expand
Markets are competitive. We have a huge competitive advantage in Australia with our land area, sun and wind. Nuclear in Australia is a brain fart - even Dutton knows that he is just pissing in the wind.