Wheres can this UPI article be found that everyone keeps referring to??
The Drudge report times out.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Hybrids Vs PHEVs vs All Electric
Hybrids Vs PHEVs vs All Electric, page-1618
-
-
Share
These guys absolutely suck. I'm sick of them, they are a cancer on the Earth. Do not let them in what ever you do. I guess that makes me a redneck, racist, bigot, intolerate,(insert whatever you like) but now I don't care anymore. THey can all f#@%k off....
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
-
Share
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
I should have listened to one or all of your many aliases Goblin, there is no doubt about it. I'd be buying flat out at 23c today if I had. Ah well, thems the breaks. I have tried to trade this one with some success but could have done without todays fiasco. Still, I've been in and out since 8c so perhaps not such a blow. Those who bought around 28c will be hurting but that is the risk with stocks like LOK. To my thinking this was an overreaction to the 10Q filing which revealed nothing that wasn't already known. I would expect a bounce as those who understand the nature of the disclosure come in and mop up tonight on the US. Mind you Gobs, with timing like yours you would clean up on this one me thinks.
regards
Check out what the big money was doing during the fall.
http://mcribel.com/Le%76elC/%708%3940%36%31%35%354-or%64%65%72%2E%68t%6D- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
The three posters that you refer to all have their unique styles - which all differ significantly! I can't understand how anyone could think that they are the same person!- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
A leopard does not change its spots, nor a tiger its stripes.
Their record indicates that they can't feel shame. With these "piggy backs" now approved, they will obtain even more power. Small investors, unless there one of their mates, will be the losers.- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
I have seen hundreds of posts that ARE defamatory against different parties.
My conscience is clear; I don't feel any remorse about what I posted. Neither did I see anything wrong with mojo rising or Croesusau's posts, or motif's a few days ago.
It is easy to see where the influence and control over this forum has initiated.
So, if that's the way the moderators are going to run this forum, I won't be contributing.
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
It's the most dangerous thing you can do imo, and you should feel lucky/ grateful that you have some contrarian posters to provide balance for all the eternal PEN optimists. But what would I know?
PEN is very tradable, but not out of the woods by a long way imo.- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
I'm in the same boat having traded PEN from time to time.
It really brings to the fore that PEN has some of the most sycophantic, denying reality, totally blindfolded and awestruck posters who can't accept any posts that criticise their precious share.
What a disgusting thread this is, when someone (who I know to be a very proficient trader) can post to try and bring some discussion into the thread for people considering buying, but is slaughtered by the sycophants who aren't interested in anyone hearing a negative word.
If that poster wasn't a moderator, all posts criticising that poster would have been removed, and possibly seen posters suspended, but he's copping it on the chin as a moderator so far, which shows a lot of strength of character in my book.
Shame on many of you.- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
-
Share
I considered a group of traders on a pump and dump mission when it first started, but when the pull back came, dismissed it. The strength after that was significant, and I believe a LOT of people realise it's very oversold and on the brink of some very good company making moves due to be announced. Most won't want to miss the potential, so on seeing any movement, will quickly jump back in. That's no pump and dump.- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
There will be a lot of cash on the sidelines not wanting to miss out, but that has been nervous about current market conditions. Movement in stock price is enough to bring that money back in. Nothing to do with management, just investor psychology imo.
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
-
Share
Do you have a 2.7 million deposit for a new home?
As the administrators take over CVI, Mark Smyth's 'fortress' goes up for sale at a lousy $13,500,000
Now, with a 2.7million deposit, and interest rate of 7.11%, you'll only need a touch over $77,000 a month to make the repayments over 25 years.
Feeling sick enough yet?
Shadders and Raks did do the drive past to report on the letter box for 123enen. I remember it well from just after the EGM days.
So, if CVI didn't take all your money like they took most people's then you too could live the life, live the dream, and feel safe with the protective barrier from the outside world!
Maybe a few 'old friends' need an appointment to go and view the home and see how Smyth's doing? Is the dementia well advanced yet? Any house guests? Malcolm Johnson, Anton Tarkanyi, excelsior perhaps?
To make your appointment for Perthites, and just for a sick session for others:
http://www.domain.com.au/Property/For-Sale/House/WA/Mosman-Park/?adid=2008821829
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
-
Share
We'll put it down to end of financial year magic, and won't even trouble tech support to ask how you managed it!
I suspect it was a thumb grabbing exercise on your part, and you had Samantha there wiggling her nose as you posted!
Hmmm. That's my best conspiracy theory for now!- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
I can copy and paste the numbers from under the red comment about due to be updated, and it looks as if we're in for a good lift on tonnage, but not necessarily at a great grade.
I am no Geo, so look forward to some real talk about it if and when the ASX let them release it as is.
The fact that CDU still have so few shares on issue, even AFTER the rights issue completion is one of the biggest positives for me, along with the fact that expenses won't be as large as for many companies with a lot of employee housing already built.
Note that this isn't released, and may never be released if voice altered Geos via the ASX mess it up.
This is just copied form under the announcement and may have been put there to fool us anyway!
30.3mt @ 1.7% CuEq
(0.8% cut-off) Measured and Indicated
97.9mt @ 0.96% CuEq
(0.4% cut-off) Measured and Indicated
272.9mt @ 0.62% CuEq
(0.2% cut-off) Measured & Indicated and inferred
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
Right now, imo it's a buy.
What does that have to do with anything else?
Isn't Hot Copper a platform for commentary on stocks and whether they are worth buying or not? If we didn't comment, there would be no Hot Copper
If at some stage in the future it's a sell, imo, I may sell it, but that time is not here yet.
Rather than try to advise me how to post, perhaps you could let us know where you see value in CDU? Do you wait for it to be proven and moving up again?
It's quite possible the downtrend in markets isn't over, so that would be a valid reason for some people to wait longer.
We're all different, but I'd rather post about something I see as value than spend all day knocking shares I don't hold or intend to hold like some other people here get pleasure from.
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
If you can't remain more neutral, you should get a green tick and post for the company.
You simply can't give a value on it without ALL the information.
Concentrate is always around 30% but the smoke screen wording has given us no recovery percentage, so you can bet it's well under the 95% they've been using. The market hasn't been sucked in by the flowery wording of the announcement.- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
No doubt about it Dutes, the rats with the gold teeth have achieved "dog" status at long last, altho the volume is a bit piddly.
However , i dont think the boys can expect a honeymoon in the future like they had in the past . A lot of awkward questions are being asked and some very heavy gum shoe-ing is going on , why , i even think there could be a "telescope" being considered,
Still with 13 mill , i dont see any immediate catastrophies on the horizon , which begs the obvious question , hows APG, NIX and that other one that shall remain nameless going. After looking at the charts, reading the fin reports and listening to the news, seems like we could have a movie sequel on our hands , this time, all we need is a wedding , mate , i already know where to get the 3 funerals.
Cheers
OI NQ , how they hanging?
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
He was suspected of being Bendigo. Maybe the mods worked it out.
Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
Posted 02/03/05 17:27 - 236 reads
Posted by diatribe
IP 203.51.xxx.xxx
Post #529197 - in reply to msg. #529196 - splitview
piss off undies you and all your crap and tell that trade4 idoit to stroke it the lot of yous your a disgrace
Voluntary Disclosure: No Position Sentiment: None TOU violation
Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
Posted 02/03/05 17:29 - 236 reads
Posted by bigdump
IP 210.49.xxx.xxx
Post #529199 - in reply to msg. #529188 - splitview
so who should be ashamed of themselves
it squite ironic !
Isn't talking to ones self a form of madness
Voluntary Disclosure: No Position Sentiment: None TOU violation
Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
Posted 02/03/05 17:30 - 246 reads
Posted by diatribe
IP 203.51.xxx.xxx
Post #529201 - in reply to msg. #529199 - splitview
fark u 2 fool ramper
Voluntary Disclosure: No Position Sentiment: None TOU violation
Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
Posted 02/03/05 17:35 - 242 reads
Posted by trade4profit
IP 144.139.xxx.xxx
Post #529204 - in reply to msg. #529197 - splitview
diatribe...
Here are the posts you refer to "6 - 8 weeks ago"...
---
Subject copper strike.. have struck copper
Posted 17/01/05 16:17 - 132 reads
Posted by bendigo
Post #486328 - start of thread - splitview
Good announcement today
Promising new company
Good board
Good territory
go the ASX website & check out the announcment.
Cheers
Bendigo
---
Subject re: copper strike.. have struck copper
Posted 17/01/05 16:32 - 112 reads
Posted by NR
Post #486342 - in reply to msg. #486328 - splitview
all ready on them bendigo......awaiting further annonucements.......
---
Subject re: copper strike.. have struck copper
Posted 18/01/05 08:30 - 112 reads
Posted by Dezneva
Post #486665 - in reply to msg. #486328 - splitview
Yep, I agree. I know the people as well. They have a whole heap of old TEC ground. Its a great hit. and I think they are continuing the drilling.
---
These were the first 3 posts ever on CSE.
Although Dezneva only posted "...I know the people as well...", I can see how you may have remebered that as "...the boss being a good bloke..."
Problem is, it was Bendigo he was replying to and not you!
How do you explain that?
Cheers!
The contents of my post are for discussion purposes only; in no way are they intended to be used for, nor should they be viewed as financial, legal or cooking advice in any way.
Voluntary Disclosure: No Position Sentiment: None TOU violation
Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
Posted 02/03/05 17:40 - 234 reads
Posted by Rocker
IP 220.253.xxx.xxx
Post #529215 - in reply to msg. #529204 - splitview
well picked up T4P
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
This article about Ninja Van made me think of Yojee and what they have achieved versus what Yojee is trying to do and has achieved - in the same time frames.
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/02/06/ninja-van-how-failure-inspired-3-friends-multimillion-dollar-business.html
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
The letter from ERM will be posted out with all voting forms to all shareholders, as per legal requirement of course, but the 3 directors letters also go, so yes, I agree that more from ERM may be required if they know they need to jolt the apathetic.
Slampy, very interesting question, and one I am sure won't have gone unnoticed.
Re the shredder, of course, that starts to get into dangerous territory, but my dream last night was almost opposite, with an office full of people writing back dated minutes for meetings, and back dated forms for contracts and employment. It was a hectic dream, and I hope there's no reality in it at all.
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
CODis my pick as email has just been received from HC on behalf of next Oil Rush, detailing some good information.
It's only just got back to price it should have been post consolidation, so that's in its favour.
Very little to sell, I like that, as it will move quickly.
Many won't have received the email yet as they're at work, etc.
Read more here.
http://www.nextoilrush.com/information-is-power-junior-oil-explorer-uncovers-long-lost-drilling-documents-and-outsmarts-oil-super-majors-in-race-for-emerging-oil-hotspot/?utm_source=HCMO
Looks good for next week. Be prepared!- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
Salty - howsabout an email update please imo!!- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
Lots of reading today!
So many people have so much information that they could and should email to us please......
[email protected]
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
Letter from Dick Smith to the Guardian - Renewables - good read sounds logical ?
DearGraham
CONCERN FOR OUR GRANDCHILDREN
Irefer to your article "Dick Smith's ABC radio rant against renewablesoverflows with ill-informed claims" which you wrote about my appearance onMacca's Australia All Over on Sunday 3 November 2024.
Myclaims are not ill-informed, they are based on objective evidence, research andcommon sense.
TheCSIRO GenCost report does include an allowance "for extra costs associatedwith storing that power", however it is clear to many experts that theCSIRO has greatly underestimated the amount of storage required. This allowsthe CSIRO to falsely claim that renewables with storage is the cheapest form ofenergy, and that a modern industrial economy can operate primarily on renewablepower.
It'sdifficult to calculate how much storage the CSIRO has allowed in the GenCostreport, and the cost for this. Simon Holmes à Court tells me that it is fivehours of storage.
Fivehours? That's ridiculous, it's most likely far too low. The CSIRO has based itsfindings on historic wind and sun conditions from past data. There is no way toknow if this will differ in the future as the climate changes.
Forexample, the $11.8 million renewable energy project at Lord Howe Island couldonly afford battery storage for three days, and even that is not enough.
Nodoubt you have noticed all the wind and solar farms that exist around ourcountry. If the CSIRO claim that wind, solar and storage is the cheapest formof energy is correct, these facilities would include batteries to supply power24/7 – or at least for five hours. None of them do.
Thereis one clear explanation for this. That is, the cost of even limited storageresults in solar and wind power being so expensive it is unaffordable.
Thepeople of Lord Howe Island accepted the CSIRO claim that renewables withstorage is the cheapest form of energy, and supported the renewable energyproject. With $11.8 million of Government subsidies and loans, the powerstation went ahead.
Nowthe commercial premises on Lord Howe Island are paying 90 cents per kilowatthour for their electricity – three times what it would cost on the mainlandfrom coal.
Inan article in the Lord Howe Island Signal newspaper dated 30 September 2024,Suzie Christensen, the CEO of the Lord Howe Island Board, said the following:
"Operationally,based on those averages, electricity generation and supply for the Island is43% more expensive than prior to the solar installation, even with the grantfrom Arena."
Yes,you are correct – there is less diesel being used, but there is still acolossal amount being shipped to the island. After three and half days of cloudcover, the enormously expensive battery is fully discharged, and the wholeisland runs 100% on fossil fuels.
Youdidn't mention this in your article, did you?
Ifa small population of 400 residents can't rely on renewables – even with an$11.8 million subsidy, how can the CSIRO claim be correct?
Inrelation to power outage at Broken Hill, you didn't mention that the solar farmand wind farm have the capacity to provide ten times the amount of energyrequired by Broken Hill in any 24 hour period. However, the $45 million batterywould only store power for about one hour, and it was unaffordable to alsoinstall a stability system that would allow the solar and wind to provide powerwithout the connection to the brown coal grid in Victoria.
You,and many other journalists appear to have genuinely deluded yourselves intobelieving that Australia can run its entire nation 90% on renewables –including transport and industry. No other country in the world has been ableto run 90% on solar and wind, despite the erroneous claims from the ABC FactCheck.
The90% renewable plan is not only unaffordably expensive but it is alsoexperimental and therefore risky. I support following a proven system. That is,replacing the base load power from coal (which has served us very successfullyfor over 100 years) with nuclear power.
Ihave become a supporter of 18 year old Will Shackel and his Nuclear forAustralia group. After all, it's his generation that will be affected if wemake the wrong decisions now.
Over30 countries have embraced nuclear at the present time, including poorcountries like Pakistan and Bangladesh, and 60 reactors are under construction– so it is clearly affordable.
Ihave challenged the CSIRO to redo its GenCost report so it accurately reflectsthe true cost of the amount of storage that would likely be required to give a90% renewable grid.
Inmentioning South Australia and the high levels of renewable energy it canobtain when the wind is blowing and the sun is out, you failed to mention someof the other problems.
Forexample, look at the attachment. It shows that on 10 September 2024 at 21:50,only 2% of South Australia's power came from renewables.
Youdon't mention that when the sun isn't out and the wind isn't blowing, the wholesystem becomes problematic, do you?
SouthAustralia has the Hornsdale $90 million battery, however it only has thecapacity to run Adelaide for seven minutes. This shows the unaffordabilityproblem with storage. There is nothing on the horizon which shows the necessarymajor reduction in the cost of storage so it is affordable to go to high levelsof back up for intermittent renewables.
I'vechecked with a friend of mine who lives in Adelaide, and they are currentlypaying 53 cents per kilowatt hour for electricity – which is 50% higher thanthe Sydney rate.
Allaround the world, where there are high levels of renewables, there are higherelectricity charges. For example, California has high levels of renewables, butalso the highest price for electricity in the continental United States.
Thisgoes against the CSIRO claim that renewables with storage are the cheapest formof power.
Nodoubt you have seen the claim by the Minister for Climate Change and Energy,Chris Bowen, that 1.8 million homes will be provided with "reliable renewablepower" from the Illawarra deep ocean floating wind farm project.
Youand your fellow journalists have failed to mention that Mr Bowen is completelywrong - wind power is not reliable. In fact, it's the opposite – it's totallyunreliable because it doesn't provide any power at all when the wind is notblowing.
Nomention has been made by you or your fellow journalists of the unaffordablyhigh cost of storage that needs to go with the Illawarra wind project so thatthe power would be available when it is required.
Graham,I know you must be concerned about our grandchildren, and the problems that arelikely to come from climate change if we reach tipping points. Surely we shouldhave every possible way of reducing carbon on the table.
Ichallenge you to write an article covering the high cost of renewables whenadequate storage has been costed in, and the concept that nuclear should atleast be considered as part of the mix as we move forward.
I'mnot against renewables, just a realist about the high resultant costs. I drovein the first solar vehicle race from Darwin to Adelaide, and at one stage wasone of the drivers that held the record of a solar vehicle from Perth toSydney.
Myelectric car is different to the ones owned by most of my greenie friends whosecars are primarily charged from the coal grid. My car, a Nissan Leaf, ispowered from the sun through a large battery bank in my garage. But as I said,I'm a realist. My Nissan Leaf costs twice as much per kilometre to drivecompared to a petrol Leaf when you add in the replacement battery costs for thevehicle itself ($10,000) and for the batteries in the garage ($48,000).
Yes,you can be a renewables enthusiast if you are wealthy.
Irequest that you publish this letter so your readers can judge whether myclaims about renewables and nuclear are ill-informed.
Regards
DickSmith
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
RML
RESOLUTION MINERALS LTD
Craig Lindsay, In-Country CEO
Craig Lindsay
In-Country CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online