Ann: Appendix 3B , page-59

By Hardman:

"I know plenty about ESI. I was a holder when it was in its original form as a toxic waste treatment mob (back in the 90's), with a technology that never really worked. It went broke, and was rebirthed by current management who allocated hundreds of millions of shares to themselves at a fraction of a cent in the process. then it raced to $1 on what was obviously a gargantuan P&D - I sold out in the 70-80c range and still cannot believe my luck at getting bailed out at a mulit bagger gain from my original dog of a holding. the sp has plummeted back to current 2c range now, and it looks seriously troubled based on the grumblings of the posters over there.

all in all, perfect for MNM."


Talk about confused and inviting legals.
I would be withdrawing that if i was you Hardman, you obviously know little about ettiquette or the companies current play with Tincom/Vietnam, which between ESI and MNM has the cheapest product and how advanced we are by comparison to you from a commercialisation point of view.
You seem to be making some desperate and confused statements that may get you into trouble, while coming over to this forum to make some fuss over nothing tangible.
Thanks for taking to time and trouble to come here to stir with little to back you up.

I will pass your comments on to the company for you.

Lautrec