Ann: Harts Range Boasts High Grade Niobium, page-32

@lootgaloot

Here are the miscloses between plotted sample location in Figure AA-5 of this release and the actual coordinates tabled elsewhere in the releases.

The closest a sample gets to its actual location is 130m and the farthest is 870m. Don't worry though, it's all schematic...it will be alright in the end.

The three sample locations not labelled don't plot near any of the tabled sample coordinates.

			delta E	delta N	dist m
1
2	bob's	HRS002	743	437	862
3	cusp	HRS003A	-21	-237	238
4	dune	HRS006	361	-3	361
5	dune	HRS007	267	-105	287
6	cusp north	HRS008	6	-494	494
7	cusp north	HRS009	-150	-234	278
8	cusp north	HRS010	852	-163	867
9	cusp	HRS011	-122	-56	134
10	cusp	HRS012	433	295	524
11	bob's north	HRS013	327	-36	329
12	bob's west	HRS014	792	233	826
13	bob's west	HRS015	194	-440	481
14	big jay	HRS017	-275	184	331
15	big jay	HRS018	636	287	698

If it's that bloody schematic, why put AA-5 in at all?

Why are there no radioactivity readings for Cusp, Cusp North and Bob's North? They were all over these things with a geiger counter.

Which set of "Next Steps" will they actually be following, those from page 6...



or those from page 14...



I'd be interested to know who compiled this release.

It's time the geo-director started to do some quality control.