IMO the concerning aspect for MMR shareholders is that the Minister has the power to make decisions in relation to titles under the OPGGS Act. That the Minister's decision must be consistent with advice provided by NOPTA is a fallacy described by the arguments for legal action against the government in the posts above. MMR holders may have been fortunate with Scomo's previous f-up of the system in that he provided the 'bias' basis for legal argument against his decision. Surely one can't keep harping on about bias just because an unfavourable decision is handed down. Husic may have attempted at pre-empting the bias angle by describing the decision as 'in the public interest'. Grabbing my popcorn and looking forward to the next instalment of the 'bullshit and distorted facts' show from DB!
MMR Price at posting:
0.5¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Held
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)