but the Chinese with the possibility of owning 51% of two tenements looks to me that it locks them in to a long term holding as a cornerstone position
you say:
"Hence a takeover of MCO was not possible without the agreement of the Garlings (or just NG alone)"
my view is that a takeover of MCO would have been be quite possible and that the Garlings were not holding enough to resist a determined effort by Kal interests
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $9.024M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 105826 | 1.4¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.5¢ | 127714 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.21pm 16/09/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| MCO (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable