Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Earths Energy Budget misrepresentation of reality., page-5

First 5 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
jopo

15,816 Posts.

21/02/25

19:35

Post #: 77972105
Share

Originally posted by NevBhc: ↑

There are many flaws above, which could be debated forever.

In summary:
You can't just ignore the 342 W/m^2 radiate transfer because it devastates your claim, hand waving doesn't impress.
Especially without offering a mathematically balanced alternative that aligns with physical reality.

Conclusion
The magnitudes of IR reaching the surface, incoming from the Sun and emitted to space are all now measured with good precision along with the spectrum of each. You'll need to account for all of these and present the mathematics to convincingly refute 150 years of science before you publish and receive your Nobel for your new theory of atmospheric physics.
When do you plan to publish this ?

Expand

Sorry Nev. I forgot to tag you in response above.
Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

NUZ

Neurizon inks $1.5M loan against R&D Tax Rebate

IXR

Ionic Rare Earths falls -7% as momentum slips on vague production update

HotCopper Trends: Wall of quarterlies dominate; then there's Micro-X & Ionic

HAR

Haranga jumps +7% on Lincoln acquisition

ASX Market Close: Index rebounds as investors buoyant | July 30, 2025

First 5 Last