Not sure what the problem is, again you made an unsubstantiated claim that granite cannot be made to be ionic clay in situ recovery. That was my sole point. I showed you screenshots saying that doesn't appear to be the case. I'm not arguing the point that perhaps BCM has some positive elements as far as porosity and permeability goes, which may mean recoveries could be slightly better than most in situ recovery setups. I will stop there, as you just keep going off on unrelated tangents.
Ann: Ema Rare Earths Scoping Study confirms low CAPEX and OPEX, page-21
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $19.00M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 1.5¢ | 1.5¢ | 1.4¢ | $24.17K | 1.683M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | 1522407 | 1.4¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.5¢ | 3266532 | 6 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 11.58am 31/07/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| BCM (ASX) Chart |