Webinar TODAY @ 11am AWST, page-8

Thanks Oxxa , i got it , i was reading from bottom up . Here is a thought oxxa :

are there any home grown independant large mining companies in the czech republic ?

ChatGPT said:

Yes, the Czech Republic is home to several significant independent mining companies. Notable examples include:

• Sev.en Energy AG: Founded by Czech entrepreneur Pavel Tykač, Sev.en Energy operates major coal mines such as the Vršany and ČSA mines, along with power plants including Chvaletice and Počerady. The company has expanded internationally, acquiring energy assets in the UK and Australia.Wikipedia

• Severočeské doly a.s.: This company operates the Tusimice and Doly Bilina mines in the Ústí nad Labem region, which are among the largest in the country.GlobalData

• Sokolovská uhelná, právní nástupce, a.s.: Manages the Jiri Mine in the Karlovy Vary region, contributing significantly to the nation's coal production.GlobalData

These companies exemplify the presence of substantial homegrown, independent mining operations within the Czech Republic.

Sources

4o

You said:

Would they have the dollares and expertise to want to buy out EMH half of the cinovec project ?

ChatGPT said:

Great question — and a timely one considering Cinovec’s strategic importance. Let’s break it down by looking at the capabilities, motives, and challenges facing potential Czech buyers like Sev.en Energy, Severočeské doly, and Sokolovská uhelná, and whether they could realistically take over European Metals Holdings' (EMH’s) 49% stake in the Cinovec project.

✅ 1. Financial Capacity ("Do they have the dollars?")

Sev.en Energy

• Very likely has the financial firepower.

• Owned by billionaire Pavel Tykač, one of the wealthiest individuals in the Czech Republic.

• Sev.en has made major international acquisitions, including coal and energy assets in the UK and Australia, reportedly worth hundreds of millions to over a billion USD.

• If they see Cinovec as a strategic long-term energy transition asset (lithium for EVs, etc.), they could absolutely fund a takeover — potentially alone or with co-investors.

Severočeské doly / ČEZ connection

• Severočeské doly is owned by ČEZ, the Czech state-backed utility.

• ČEZ already owns 51% of Geomet, the project company for Cinovec, so a move to acquire EMH’s 49% would consolidate ownership.

• ČEZ has deep resources (2023 net profit: over €1 billion) and political backing, making it the most logical acquirer — if it wanted full control.

Sokolovská uhelná

• A smaller operator, focused on coal and power generation. It may not have the capital or lithium transition expertise to be a likely solo buyer.

• Could, however, act as a local partner or minority backer in a joint venture.

✅ 2. Technical Expertise ("Do they have the expertise?")

• These Czech companies have strong mining and energy operations experience — but none have built or operated a lithium mine or hydroxide conversion plant.

• They would likely need international technical partners or consultants for Cinovec's complex lithium extraction and downstream refining (especially given the challenge of processing zinnwaldite).

• ČEZ has reportedly already been working with external consultants and EMH on feasibility studies and downstream options.

✅ 3. Strategic Motives ("Would they want to?")

• Yes — if aligned with Czech energy strategy and EU battery ambitions.

• The Czech government and EU are under pressure to support domestic lithium supply chains and reduce reliance on China.

• Owning 100% of Cinovec could give ČEZ (or another Czech-backed group) strategic control over the largest hard-rock lithium resource in Europe.

• With European funding (Just Transition Fund, potential IPCEI status), acquiring EMH’s stake could be attractive if it can be done below future project valuation.

⚠️ 4. What Might Hold Them Back?

• Timing: EMH may want a premium that Czech buyers aren’t willing to pay yet.

• Permitting and politics: Until final permits are locked in and construction begins, local players may prefer to wait and derisk.

• EU optics: A state-influenced buyer taking 100% control may raise regulatory questions, depending on how it’s structured.

Conclusion (Whimsical but grounded guess)

Yes, there are Czech entities that could afford and technically manage a buyout, especially:

• ČEZ (already in the driver’s seat), and/or

• Sev.en Energy (deep pockets, bold deals, billionaire backer).

If EMH’s stake were floated for sale today, there’s a realistic chance one of these groups would move — particularly if there’s pressure to counter Chinese interest, or if the project is nearing construction phase.

Would you like a hypothetical valuation model based on EMH’s stake and current comparable lithium projects?

You said:

that hypothetical valuation would br good , yes please

ChatGPT said:

Hypothetical Valuation of EMH's Stake

Scenario	Total Project Value (AUD)	EMH 49% Stake Value (AUD)
Conservative	800000000	392000000.0
Base Case	1200000000	588000000.0
Strategic/Upside	1800000000	882000000.0

Here's a breakdown of the hypothetical valuation for European Metals Holdings' 49% stake in the Cinovec project under various scenarios. Let me know if you'd like this modeled in other currencies or tied to projected lithium prices, production forecasts, or NPV calculations.

You said:

can you use the dollar symbal and commas in the numbers and advise what currency ?

ChatGPT said:

Hypothetical Valuation of EMH's Stake (Formatted)

Scenario	Total Project Value (AUD)	EMH 49% Stake Value (AUD)
Conservative	$800,000,000 AUD	$392,000,000 AUD
Base Case	$1,200,000,000 AUD	$588,000,000 AUD
Strategic/Upside	$1,800,000,000 AUD	$882,000,000 AUD

Here's the updated valuation table with currency formatting. All figures are in Australian Dollars (AUD), and EMH’s 49% stake could hypothetically be worth between $392 million and $882 million AUD, depending on how the total Cinovec project is ultimately valued.

Would you like to see this converted into USD or EUR as well?

4o

You said:

can you give me a copy version of the table with currency

ChatGPT said:

Certainly! Here's a copy-ready version of the table with currency formatting in Australian Dollars (AUD):

Hypothetical Valuation of EMH's 49% Stake in the Cinovec Project

Scenario	Total Project Value (AUD)	EMH 49% Stake Value (AUD)
Conservative	$800,000,000 AUD	$392,000,000 AUD
Base Case	$1,200,000,000 AUD	$588,000,000 AUD
Strategic / Upside	$1,800,000,000 AUD	$882,000,000 AUD

Let me know if you’d like a version in USD, EUR, or a downloadable Excel or Word file format.

4o