Infose, you’ve just laid out a series of confused, inconsistent thoughts that betray a deeper issue—not with the Bible, but with your own assumptions about it. Let’s untangle the spaghetti, as you put it. You do sound like a confused mess at times to be honest, I genuinely avoid your posts as they seem very distorted and confusing.
"The Bible is open to a multitude of interpretations"
That statement is only half true. People may attempt many interpretations, yes—but the Bible doesn’t endorse all of them as valid. The problem isn’t with the Bible—it’s with people twisting Scripture to fit their biases. Even Peter warned about this: "His letters contain some things that are hard to understand, which ignorant and unstable people distort, as they do the other Scriptures, to their own destruction." (2 Peter 3:16)
Truth doesn’t become invalid just because some people misinterpret it. That’s like blaming math because some students get the answer wrong.
"Would we speak about the Daughter of God if the culture was matriarchal?"
That’s a loaded, speculative question that ignores the fact that YHWH reveals Himself as He is, not as we prefer Him to be. You're assuming that divine truth would bend to social constructs—when in reality, it’s the culture that needs to bend to the Creator.
Yeshua wasn’t called the "Son" because of patriarchy; He’s the Son because He proceeded from the Father—this is about divine relationship, not gender politics.
"How can Mary be a virgin if she had other children?"
This is a classic misunderstanding fueled by Catholic tradition—not the Bible. Scripture never teaches that Mary remained a perpetual virgin. In fact, the Bible clearly names Yeshua’s brothers and sisters (Mark 6:3, Matthew 13:55-56).
The “Virgin Mary” title refers to the fact that she was a virgin when she gave birth to Yeshua. That’s the miracle—a virgin birth, not eternal virginity. Your understanding here is reaching at best and lacks basic understanding.
"Piece of fiction, literary spaghetti..."
You’ve gone from saying the Bible is profound enough to spark endless interpretations, to now calling it fiction. That’s a contradiction. Either it’s so deep it demands interpretation—or it’s shallow fiction. It can’t be both.
If you’re going to dismiss it, at least be consistent. But if you dare to actually read it with an open heart, you’ll see it’s not a tangled mess—it’s a living message. It convicts, divides, heals, and transforms. That’s why it’s been preserved, studied, and believed for thousands of years.
Final Thought
Thinking “outside the box” isn’t the issue here—rejecting truth because it doesn’t fit your box is. The Bible doesn’t need to conform to modern speculation or cultural shifts. It speaks truth—whether people like it or not.
You call it fiction, but I challenge you: read it deeply, honestly, and prayerfully. If you do, you may find out it’s not just a book. It’s a voice—and it’s calling you home.
