The other reason for the consolidation could be to reduce back office costs with share registry maintenance.
With less shares, there could be a push by the board to buy offmarket small holdings (remember, they are also doing a $200m share buyback), thereby reducing the number of shareholders and so reducing the costs.
I would have preferred 5 for 1, but can live with it.
HT1
ten for one, page-31
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 34 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)