There's no way in the world that FAR would be signing an agreement that contained a 'termination for convenience' clause. Investment of this magnitude (drilling) requires certainty, and such a clause deprives them of that certainly. No company would put money into a venture if that clause were present. The agreement will be watertight because both parties need it to be.
-Disco
imagine, page-16
Add FAR (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
49.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $45.74M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 48.5¢ | 49.5¢ | 48.5¢ | $100.5K | 203.1K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 90297 | 49.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 50.0¢ | 2422 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 12.36pm 29/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| FAR (ASX) Chart |