Share
13,958 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 1074
clock Created with Sketch. 07/05/25
10:24
Share
Originally posted by Megafauna
↑
“Potential Outcomes • Short-Term Bargaining : Canada could use NAL’s lithium as leverage in trade talks to secure U.S. concessions, such as tariff relief or funding for Québec’s battery industry. This could include commitments to stockpile NAL’s output in a nascent reserve. Long-Term Regional Strategy : NAL could anchor a North American critical minerals club, with its lithium supporting a reserve that ensures supply chain security and fosters joint investment in processing and recycling. This would align with calls for a “minerals security partnership” involving the U.S., Canada, and allies. Global Positioning : A reserve bolstered by NAL could position North America as a counterweight to China in the critical minerals market, attracting investment from allies like the EU and Australia, who also seek to diversify supply chains. Conclusion The North American Lithium mine has the potential to be a significant bargaining chip in creating a critical mineral strategic reserve due to its production capacity, strategic location, and alignment with North American goals to secure critical mineral supply chains. By leveraging NAL’s output, Canada could negotiate favorable terms with the U.S. and Mexico, fostering a regional reserve that enhances economic and national security. However, success depends on overcoming political, economic, and environmental challenges through coordinated policies and investments. The broader trend of critical minerals as geopolitical tools, as seen in Canada-U.S. trade dynamics and Australia’s strategies, supports the plausibility of this approach.
Expand
So we get 1,150th of that, some deal, now that is what I call totally shafted, will the insto holder vote for this, or like us mere share holders cop the loss. Not even 1%
Last edited by
Ianwil :
07/05/25
(20min delay)