CRML Tanbreez, page-195

You said
this fact is even accepted by all environment groups
Now you say
here we go again trotting out noah who seam to only want to object
So there was an environmental group who objected. In fact there were two. In fact they were the two biggest and pretty much only ones in Greenlamd.
How on ever did you over look that
Ohh hang on maybe you didn't over look that and maybe you just lied
Whopsie daisy

samples were taken under contract over the entire license with no limits to where or how
Prove it
You cant lol
Whopsy daisy
Who is an embarrassed boy


And so why are you out there directing Critical metals contractors where to drill again ?
whoopsie daisy

That's really odd because what you say and what ETM did is different to what you did. Even though you assure us You both did exactly the same thing the same thing
Whoopsie daisy

You see etm Was professionally sampled and they used someone who sampled the site. Took the samples themselves on an aeroplane To Perth. Escorted them to the labs and submitted them and had them ianalysed to make sure that nothing could get lost in between. I believe you find these guys because you didn't like how they did it ?

Whoopsie Daisy

What you advise was different from this and I see there is the possibility that something could get lost in between

Whoopsie Daisy

it would have been better if you'd done it like etm did . But now people have to trust in your reputation. How's that one going you think ?

Wasn't it also reported recently in the press that critical metals has been accused by environmental groups of not submitting samples of concern?
Isn't critical metals doing the sampling on your tanbreez Site with the uranium?
Whoopsie Daisy
Who's a very naughty boy