worried about what ?--and further more, page-19

On what legal nuance can you make a statement that basically says YOU have to PAY.?

If you are SO confident that we have to pay,why then are Ben blocking the case going ahead.

Further to the fresh air shot at Bodo,suffice to say that investors signed a document that has Great Southern Finance hand prints all over it,not only that,inside their product disclosure to boot,that is sold later when it went pear shaped at a discount to Ben.

Young,Rhodes and Steven Cole and it is only speculation are being deep throated by ASIC.

However a stellar accountant that sits beside you,hanging on to Ben's coat tail's by the name of John Young in the hearings pertaining to the Statement of Discovery that are directly related to his actions or inactions in running GTP.

we can assume this case,that investors want and ben doesn't,and I am preetty sure Young doesn't is all intense a forensic accountant expose' that when Ben lose that the so called book figure that GTP has, will in a blinding flash turn into a massive liability.

To quote the former minister for O'connor Wilson Tuckey

When Great Southern collapsed, Tuckey was asked for comment by the Sydney Morning Herald. He said "Everyone thought [a plantation strategy] was a good idea at the time". -He argued investors would probably not lose their money, but "shareholders and lenders could be in a bit of trouble".[14] With both Great Southern Group and Timbercorp under administration,