Same geology and rocks as WCN, same exploration history by previous explorers, dealing with the same local stakeholders and same logistics so quite comparable to WCN.
I think obviously, besides the geological factors of having or not having an obviously high-grade orebody, the difference could be in management. Here at SMM - I assume this is the same Chis Hansen who was at TMR (Tempest)? Interesting that the re-processing of the 1968 IP was possible and they seem fairly keen on it.
Ann: Widespread Cu Mineralisation Observed at Coppermine Project, page-8
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
