NO such thing as Climate Change?, page-14144

First 14144 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Nefrite

1,621 Posts.

70

04/06/25

16:54

Post #: 79315989
Share

Originally posted by Scott th Ratbag: ↑

cheers alonso.
1) I don't believe in predictions. they often miss important variables. but physics gives a principle definition of what gases do when heated and that heat is retained by carbon bonds.
2) of course if carbon increases as a proportion to other gases, it will have a stronger effect. so naturally, reducing carbon emissions will reduce the heat retention due to less carbon being added. this is of course a comparative statement. comparing 'business as usual' emissions means a clear increase in effects, such as turbulence intensity, water evaporation etc. which has a clear impact on our climate. more to the point increasing removal of carbon gases from the atmosphere will reverse the problems.

we've had a relatively stable climatic environment for 10,000 years. a long enough period for humans to develop farming and technology which has enabled human overpopulation. over the last 200 yrs we humans have dug up millions of years of carbon laid down in the ground through the carboniferous period of the planets evolution and released \the carbon into the atmosphere with the vastly greatest amount during the last 75yrs.

carbon is identified as the gas responsible for varying the atmospheric temperature. you can see the measures in the table I posted watt the Jurassic. higher carbon content is related to atmospheric temperature.

does this make sense to you?

so logic suggests reducing carbon emissions will slow the increasing temperatures. removing carbon gases from the atmosphere will result in falling atmospheric temperatures.

this provides the reasoning for net zero. carbon gas proportions wont increase once all countries achieve net zero. removal of carbon gases will occur through natural processes after around 50 years. (see half life of carbon gases and how they are "naturally" recycled out of the atmosphere)

its science and reasoning based on factual properties of carbon gases.

this has nothing to do with politics though. we can argue the politics till the milking is due and it won't change what is happening. until we address the cause, no problem can be fixed.

is this sensible? its just logic.

Expand

Dug up only? I would have thought to be accurate you would also have to say something about pumping or sucking?
2 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

LRV

Larvotto hits "go" on Hillgrove Project

HotCopper Trends: Final day of quarterlies; Larvotto FID & more

Investor education equals superior returns

SS1

Sun Silver unveils Maverick Springs assay results

I88

Infini Resources appoints Rohan Bone as CEO ahead of Phase 2 campaign