market never lies, page-131

again you keep making things up first uranium now titanium again with no proof
I was waiting for you to fall into that trap . Too easy

Here is the uranium issue you seem to pretend doesn't exist and you want everyone to believe for some reason
Of course Eric Jensen would be a major political party leader from memory? Also at the time wasn't he the Minister of the minerals department in Greenland? His comment pertains to his understanding of the location of uranium but of course you're saying he's lying right
I'm lying the Minister of minerals is lying the news reporter is lying the representative from the company that announced the fact is lying everybody else is lying... except you right?
Now this is where you say that the uranium problem doesn't exist and it's imaginary too right?

nro

10,936 Posts.

4110

14/12/23

17:17

Post #:71454695

Share

Originally posted by GBB:↑

as usual you refuse to look at the dataYou mean the magical data that you wont go to show, post, share or even prove exists?

how can anyone believe you.They dont. Just the media, minister and your own company rep versus a lone poster with magical data no ones ever seen but him and he wont go share with anyone.
My bets are down lol

if the greenies, the greenland govt, the environmental dept. all the mining publications say there is noneThe minister and media said otherwise in the article posted above.
You cant show us where the department said it of course can you? there you go.
Your own company rep said it in the media article.
Now you say the Greenies think its not there?
Heres what Noah thinks:
has also admitted that there is uranium in the mine area, but this is not mentioned in the consultation material". [3]
https://noah.dk/nyheder/oedelaeggelsen-af-groenlands-miljoe-er-begyndtProve any of these as lies and I wont repeat them.
Otherwise, why was there public admission of uranium suddenly disappear in the consultation material?
Has this been thoroughly investigated by the authorities?
"With the decision to grant an exploitation permit on such a flawed basis, the environmental standards are lowered so much that it becomes difficult to imagine that mining projects in the future will be rejected due to negative consequences for the environment", says Erik Jensen,I wouldnt say the greenies were happy with it. Why did you?
Happy to correct any of it if you can prove it. But clearly you cant and all these statements stand valid. Sorry.