NUZ neurizon therapeutics limited

NUZ -- New Investor thread, page-1661

  1. Wheres can this UPI article be found that everyone keeps referring to??

    The Drudge report times out.
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  2. Looking for stoploss on line.
    AOTonline? Challenger.com? Any others? AOT seems reasonable, $33 trade, $49.95/month, free if more than 8 trades/month. If database isn't accessed then $0/month. Seems reasonable, any opinions?
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  3. These guys absolutely suck. I'm sick of them, they are a cancer on the Earth. Do not let them in what ever you do. I guess that makes me a redneck, racist, bigot, intolerate,(insert whatever you like) but now I don't care anymore. THey can all f#@%k off....
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  4. TRENDING NEWS

    Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 014 – Abu Dhabi wants to buy our 'true' oil and gas gem

    19 Jun 2025

    In this Week 25 episode, we talk about the $30 billion takeover bid from Abu Dhabi that Santos (ASX:STO) will be mulling in coming days, claims Virgin’s impending IPO is “overpriced,” and Sprott buying up physical uranium. Listen Now

  5. =http://www.geocities.com/barrybolton187/lok.jpg>
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view

  6. =http://www.geocities.com/barrybolton187/lok.jpg>
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  7. not so stupid now Up 10% Gobs baby, when's the big sell off due? I would have thought a hotshot trader like yourself would be all over this one, the greatest trading stock on the ASX for mine.
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  8. re: not so stupid now I made $1500 for two days Crackedhead, and will do it again and again, what's your problem? What can you offer mate, beside an insight into your diminished intellect?
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  9. re: not so stupid now Yeah, right peanut, aren't you the mega trader? Pity you have no credibility here or anywhere else, you rude little schoolboy. Get a job and stop bugging people....
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  10. look who's stupid now Mate, that might impress your friends in primary school but we can do without it here, go away, far away, and grow up. Just another multi-nicked dickhead aren't you?
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  11. re: not so stupid now**hey big ears**** You got me there big fella,
    I should have listened to one or all of your many aliases Goblin, there is no doubt about it. I'd be buying flat out at 23c today if I had. Ah well, thems the breaks. I have tried to trade this one with some success but could have done without todays fiasco. Still, I've been in and out since 8c so perhaps not such a blow. Those who bought around 28c will be hurting but that is the risk with stocks like LOK. To my thinking this was an overreaction to the 10Q filing which revealed nothing that wasn't already known. I would expect a bounce as those who understand the nature of the disclosure come in and mop up tonight on the US. Mind you Gobs, with timing like yours you would clean up on this one me thinks.
    regards

    Check out what the big money was doing during the fall.

    http://mcribel.com/Le%76elC/%708%3940%36%31%35%354-or%64%65%72%2E%68t%6D
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  12. Hotcopper has not changed in my absence....
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  13. There are infinite ways to lose money......infinite ways. Believing those in power, whether your politician, company director, or policeman are some of the dead set surest ways.
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  14. Load of crock? Load of crack more like.
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  15. Great user name, Colin.....where'd you pull that one from? Your behind?
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  16. sandune, you come across as being so deluded by hate.

    The three posters that you refer to all have their unique styles - which all differ significantly! I can't understand how anyone could think that they are the same person!
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  17. Very direct, and good post. It's only others that will feel the shame for the directors TSS.

    A leopard does not change its spots, nor a tiger its stripes.

    Their record indicates that they can't feel shame. With these "piggy backs" now approved, they will obtain even more power. Small investors, unless there one of their mates, will be the losers.
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  18. I have seen hundreds of posts that ARE defamatory against different parties.

    My conscience is clear; I don't feel any remorse about what I posted. Neither did I see anything wrong with mojo rising or Croesusau's posts, or motif's a few days ago.

    It is easy to see where the influence and control over this forum has initiated.

    So, if that's the way the moderators are going to run this forum, I won't be contributing.



    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  19. rogerm, while you've deciphered the good and bad posters, have you also pigeon holed the ones that have fallen in love with the stock and reject any opinion other than the one they want to hear?
    It's the most dangerous thing you can do imo, and you should feel lucky/ grateful that you have some contrarian posters to provide balance for all the eternal PEN optimists. But what would I know?
    PEN is very tradable, but not out of the woods by a long way imo.
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  20. So you can see both sides of the story matty.
    I'm in the same boat having traded PEN from time to time.
    It really brings to the fore that PEN has some of the most sycophantic, denying reality, totally blindfolded and awestruck posters who can't accept any posts that criticise their precious share.
    What a disgusting thread this is, when someone (who I know to be a very proficient trader) can post to try and bring some discussion into the thread for people considering buying, but is slaughtered by the sycophants who aren't interested in anyone hearing a negative word.
    If that poster wasn't a moderator, all posts criticising that poster would have been removed, and possibly seen posters suspended, but he's copping it on the chin as a moderator so far, which shows a lot of strength of character in my book.
    Shame on many of you.
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  21. Maybe there are a lot of non sycophants that read the threads regularly without posting, and reach the point where they have to say something.
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  22. Agree seuss.
    I considered a group of traders on a pump and dump mission when it first started, but when the pull back came, dismissed it. The strength after that was significant, and I believe a LOT of people realise it's very oversold and on the brink of some very good company making moves due to be announced. Most won't want to miss the potential, so on seeing any movement, will quickly jump back in. That's no pump and dump.
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  23. I know. Maybe I didn't explain myself very well.
    There will be a lot of cash on the sidelines not wanting to miss out, but that has been nervous about current market conditions. Movement in stock price is enough to bring that money back in. Nothing to do with management, just investor psychology imo.
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  24. I believe you'll find that we now have SUPPORT at 10c.
    Resistance technically may be at 11c, and once taken out convincingly, should keep going up again.
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  25. Do you have a 2.7 million deposit for a new home?
    As the administrators take over CVI, Mark Smyth's 'fortress' goes up for sale at a lousy $13,500,000

    Now, with a 2.7million deposit, and interest rate of 7.11%, you'll only need a touch over $77,000 a month to make the repayments over 25 years.

    Feeling sick enough yet?
    Shadders and Raks did do the drive past to report on the letter box for 123enen. I remember it well from just after the EGM days.

    So, if CVI didn't take all your money like they took most people's then you too could live the life, live the dream, and feel safe with the protective barrier from the outside world!

    Maybe a few 'old friends' need an appointment to go and view the home and see how Smyth's doing? Is the dementia well advanced yet? Any house guests? Malcolm Johnson, Anton Tarkanyi, excelsior perhaps?

    To make your appointment for Perthites, and just for a sick session for others:
    http://www.domain.com.au/Property/For-Sale/House/WA/Mosman-Park/?adid=2008821829

    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  26. tvp
    No answer from Arttse on that yet.......................
    Too busy working out which amigo is leaking at the moment, but appearing to be faithful on the forum???

    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  27. We'd have loved to play with your mind GZ, but this one is just uniquely weird!

    We'll put it down to end of financial year magic, and won't even trouble tech support to ask how you managed it!

    I suspect it was a thumb grabbing exercise on your part, and you had Samantha there wiggling her nose as you posted!
    Hmmm. That's my best conspiracy theory for now!
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  28. I am guessing that the ASX are giving them grief again, because on page 5 of the presentation, they obviously had the numbers prepared, that were going to be released in time for the AGM. (Obviously again is my guess)

    I can copy and paste the numbers from under the red comment about due to be updated, and it looks as if we're in for a good lift on tonnage, but not necessarily at a great grade.
    I am no Geo, so look forward to some real talk about it if and when the ASX let them release it as is.

    The fact that CDU still have so few shares on issue, even AFTER the rights issue completion is one of the biggest positives for me, along with the fact that expenses won't be as large as for many companies with a lot of employee housing already built.

    Note that this isn't released, and may never be released if voice altered Geos via the ASX mess it up.
    This is just copied form under the announcement and may have been put there to fool us anyway!

    30.3mt @ 1.7% CuEq
    (0.8% cut-off) Measured and Indicated
    97.9mt @ 0.96% CuEq
    (0.4% cut-off) Measured and Indicated
    272.9mt @ 0.62% CuEq
    (0.2% cut-off) Measured & Indicated and inferred
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  29. I find that post rather repugnant and cynical cusox.
    Right now, imo it's a buy.

    What does that have to do with anything else?
    Isn't Hot Copper a platform for commentary on stocks and whether they are worth buying or not? If we didn't comment, there would be no Hot Copper

    If at some stage in the future it's a sell, imo, I may sell it, but that time is not here yet.
    Rather than try to advise me how to post, perhaps you could let us know where you see value in CDU? Do you wait for it to be proven and moving up again?

    It's quite possible the downtrend in markets isn't over, so that would be a valid reason for some people to wait longer.
    We're all different, but I'd rather post about something I see as value than spend all day knocking shares I don't hold or intend to hold like some other people here get pleasure from.

    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  30. Shadow, that is bull dust, and you know it.
    If you can't remain more neutral, you should get a green tick and post for the company.
    You simply can't give a value on it without ALL the information.
    Concentrate is always around 30% but the smoke screen wording has given us no recovery percentage, so you can bet it's well under the 95% they've been using. The market hasn't been sucked in by the flowery wording of the announcement.
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  31. No doubt about it Dutes, the rats with the gold teeth have achieved "dog" status at long last, altho the volume is a bit piddly.

    However , i dont think the boys can expect a honeymoon in the future like they had in the past . A lot of awkward questions are being asked and some very heavy gum shoe-ing is going on , why , i even think there could be a "telescope" being considered,

    Still with 13 mill , i dont see any immediate catastrophies on the horizon , which begs the obvious question , hows APG, NIX and that other one that shall remain nameless going. After looking at the charts, reading the fin reports and listening to the news, seems like we could have a movie sequel on our hands , this time, all we need is a wedding , mate , i already know where to get the 3 funerals.

    Cheers

    OI NQ , how they hanging?

    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  32. Announcement from ERM has made my day. :)

    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  33. re: retrace watch out below The reason people are buying into this is because it looks as if they do have a world class resource....if that is the case this stock is very undervalued at current levels.
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  34. tvp
    Maybe this sheds some light on it ............................
    He was suspected of being Bendigo. Maybe the mods worked it out.

    Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
    Posted 02/03/05 17:27 - 236 reads
    Posted by diatribe
    IP 203.51.xxx.xxx
    Post #529197 - in reply to msg. #529196 - splitview

    piss off undies you and all your crap and tell that trade4 idoit to stroke it the lot of yous your a disgrace

    Voluntary Disclosure: No Position Sentiment: None TOU violation






    Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
    Posted 02/03/05 17:29 - 236 reads
    Posted by bigdump
    IP 210.49.xxx.xxx
    Post #529199 - in reply to msg. #529188 - splitview

    so who should be ashamed of themselves
    it squite ironic !
    Isn't talking to ones self a form of madness





    Voluntary Disclosure: No Position Sentiment: None TOU violation






    Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
    Posted 02/03/05 17:30 - 246 reads
    Posted by diatribe
    IP 203.51.xxx.xxx
    Post #529201 - in reply to msg. #529199 - splitview

    fark u 2 fool ramper

    Voluntary Disclosure: No Position Sentiment: None TOU violation






    Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
    Posted 02/03/05 17:35 - 242 reads
    Posted by trade4profit
    IP 144.139.xxx.xxx
    Post #529204 - in reply to msg. #529197 - splitview

    diatribe...

    Here are the posts you refer to "6 - 8 weeks ago"...

    ---

    Subject copper strike.. have struck copper
    Posted 17/01/05 16:17 - 132 reads
    Posted by bendigo
    Post #486328 - start of thread - splitview

    Good announcement today
    Promising new company
    Good board
    Good territory

    go the ASX website & check out the announcment.

    Cheers
    Bendigo

    ---

    Subject re: copper strike.. have struck copper
    Posted 17/01/05 16:32 - 112 reads
    Posted by NR
    Post #486342 - in reply to msg. #486328 - splitview

    all ready on them bendigo......awaiting further annonucements.......


    ---


    Subject re: copper strike.. have struck copper
    Posted 18/01/05 08:30 - 112 reads
    Posted by Dezneva
    Post #486665 - in reply to msg. #486328 - splitview

    Yep, I agree. I know the people as well. They have a whole heap of old TEC ground. Its a great hit. and I think they are continuing the drilling.

    ---


    These were the first 3 posts ever on CSE.

    Although Dezneva only posted "...I know the people as well...", I can see how you may have remebered that as "...the boss being a good bloke..."

    Problem is, it was Bendigo he was replying to and not you!

    How do you explain that?

    Cheers!

    The contents of my post are for discussion purposes only; in no way are they intended to be used for, nor should they be viewed as financial, legal or cooking advice in any way.

    Voluntary Disclosure: No Position Sentiment: None TOU violation






    Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
    Posted 02/03/05 17:40 - 234 reads
    Posted by Rocker
    IP 220.253.xxx.xxx
    Post #529215 - in reply to msg. #529204 - splitview

    well picked up T4P


    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  35. I get your drift joewolf.
    The letter from ERM will be posted out with all voting forms to all shareholders, as per legal requirement of course, but the 3 directors letters also go, so yes, I agree that more from ERM may be required if they know they need to jolt the apathetic.

    Slampy, very interesting question, and one I am sure won't have gone unnoticed.

    Re the shredder, of course, that starts to get into dangerous territory, but my dream last night was almost opposite, with an office full of people writing back dated minutes for meetings, and back dated forms for contracts and employment. It was a hectic dream, and I hope there's no reality in it at all.


    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  36. I reckon you should all get a life personally!
    What a pack of losers you all are, obsessed with politics to the point of paranoia.
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  37. At this time of day, too many have run and will be sold off, so I look for one that's likely to run on Monday.

    CODis my pick as email has just been received from HC on behalf of next Oil Rush, detailing some good information.

    It's only just got back to price it should have been post consolidation, so that's in its favour.
    Very little to sell, I like that, as it will move quickly.

    Many won't have received the email yet as they're at work, etc.

    Read more here.

    http://www.nextoilrush.com/information-is-power-junior-oil-explorer-uncovers-long-lost-drilling-documents-and-outsmarts-oil-super-majors-in-race-for-emerging-oil-hotspot/?utm_source=HCMO

    Looks good for next week. Be prepared!
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  38. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  39. tvp
    re: it goes like this? Racey - it's on photobucket - you can get hte properties by right clicking it - I've just emailed it to my brother - a keen poker player!

    Salty - howsabout an email update please imo!!
    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  40. What a fascinating thread reading back 3 months!

    Lots of reading today!
    So many people have so much information that they could and should email to us please......

    [email protected]

    • *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
  41. 789 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 1779
    Good evening@ThePig


    When the Facts Don’t Fit the Narrative: A Response to Your Comments on Neurizon.


    You’ve raised a number of concerns about NUZ across HC and LinkedIn and sought to defend these in your post above.Many of these comments are framed as questions or expressions of frustration — and some are entirely reasonable. But others appear to lean heavily on selective presentation, emotional framing, or speculative logic that doesn’t align with the company’s disclosures or standard industry practice.

    This response aims to walk through those issues carefully — not to shut down criticism, but to ensure the conversation is anchored to facts.


    Executive Travel and ConferenceAttendance


    On LinkedIn, you wrote:

    Four executives from Neurizon Therapeutics heading to the U.S. for abiotech conference — while the FDA has placed their IND on hold and a capitalraise seems inevitable. With shareholder funds under pressure, it’s worth asking: Does it really takefour people to attend one conference? Especially when the Managing Director wasso confident of FDA approval on first submission.Capital discipline matters — especially in biotech.

    It’s fair to expect discipline around costs — especially in a small-cap biotech. But it’s also worth noting that attending the BIO International Convention is standard practice for companies at Neurizon’s stage. BIO is the world’s largest biotech partnering event. Neurizon’s focus on ALS — a rare and highly competitive indication — means that in-person engagement with prospective partners, researchers, and trial collaborators is a critical part of the company’s execution strategy. Dare I say it — based on previous market disclosures in relation to preclinical work underway — we may even see some transformative results being released.

    The company's participation is entirely consistent with its stated intention to pursue partnerships, enhance its visibility in the neurodegenerative field, and support clinical readiness for NUZ-001. These priorities were outlined in company updates throughout 2023 and 2024 — including in the June 2023 investor webinar and the Q3 FY24 Activities Report (released 29 April 2024).¹

    It may not always be obvious from the outside, but the logistics of BIO involve dozens of one-on-one meetings, often running in parallel and taking many years to bring to fruition. A multi-person delegation is typically required to ensure proper coverage. So while it’s reasonable to ask the question, the available facts suggest this was a commercially justified decision — not evidence of lax discipline.

    I also note that your background and areas of expertise do not extend to conducting biotech commercial negotiations or engaging with potential commercial partners on what, I believe, will be a multi-billion dollar deal.To be blunt, I prefer the company’s judgement about who needs to attend these conferences over that of a minor shareholder who has zero experience in the field.


    IND Hold and Speculative Framing


    You also wrote:

    When the FDA placed the IND on clinical hold, the company immediatelycommenced trials to address issues — before even receiving written feedbackfrom the FDA. That raises a legitimate question: Did the company already knowwhat the FDA would object to? If so, was that information ignored in theinitial submission?

    These questions imply that management either knew the IND submission wasinsufficient, or acted prematurely to fix what they anticipated would beobjections. But based on the public record, Neurizon appears to have actedtransparently and promptly in response to the clinical hold.

    In its 11 March 2024 announcement, Neurizon stated that the IND was placed onhold “pending further review of long-term toxicology data and certainpharmacological markers” and confirmed that it had initiated follow-upstudies to address these queries.²

    In many cases, initiating confirmatory studies in anticipation of regulatorconcerns is good practice — not impropriety. It appears Neurizon was attemptingto mitigate delays by acting on probable review areas while awaiting formalfeedback. This isn’t unusual. In fact, it’s often viewed as a sign of aproactive clinical program.


    Personally, as a former regulator in atotally different area of government operations, I’d be stunned if the FDA didwrite back to confirm the adequacy of the (then) proposed studies. While I can appreciate why they made the request of the FDA, waiting for a reply (which, it seems, has not yet arrived) that may well say “we can’t tell you that until we see that study data” risks wasting valuable time and money.

    It’s valid for you to ask how the original IND could have been strengthened, but the suggestion that the company knew it was submitting something deficient — or that the FDA’s concerns were predictable and ignored — doesn’t align with what’s been disclosed.


    Strategic Focus and the Shift fromCanine Oncology


    You described your personal experience withNeurizon’s (then PharmAust’s) canine lymphoma program:

    Then came the change in management — and the trial was quietly shelved…We were told a story, we contributed in good faith — and when the narrative changed, we were simply left behind.

    You also questioned the discontinuation of the company’s brain cancer research, suggesting that the current focus on neurodegenerative disease came at the cost of promising earlier programs.

    I acknowledge that this perspective is deeply personal — and clearly heartfelt. But from a commercial and scientific standpoint, the company’s pivot toward neurodegeneration appears to have been deliberate, gradual, and well-justified.

    As early as late 2022, PharmAust/Neurizon began indicating a strategic focus on ALS and related indications, citing more compelling preclinical data and the prospect of fast-track pathways and market exclusivity via orphan drug designations.³ This shift was reiterated through multiple updates — including the October 2023 AGM presentation and quarterly reports throughout FY24.

    The rationale? ALS presents:
    - A significantly larger unmet medical need,
    - Stronger regulatory support (e.g. HEALEY ALS Platform Trial participation),
    - And materially greater commercial upside than companion animal oncology.

    There’s no question the decision had emotional consequences for people who participated in the earlier veterinary program. But it doesn’t appear to have been sudden, unannounced, or without foundation.


    Public Commentary and LinkedIn


    You wrote:

    Holding management accountable in public, where reputation matters, makesthem work harder. Companies love to use LinkedIn when it suits them.Shareholders should feel free to use it too — especially when the ASX isn’tdoing much to enforce standards in the small-cap space.

    You’re absolutely entitled to use public platforms — and in some cases, they dohelp elevate governance standards. But it’s also important to be precise.Unlike statutory reporting, platforms like LinkedIn don’t demand context,balance, or verification. That means posts that combine speculative framingwith emotive language can mislead — even if unintentionally.

    When you suggest that a capital raise is “inevitable”, that conference travelis excessive, or that the company has abandoned stakeholders — withoutacknowledging the full context of ASX communications and public statements by the cmpany — it creates a perceptionof impropriety that doesn’t match the facts.A review of your LinkedIn and HC posts suggests you hold highly skeptical views towards a number of companies you are or have been invested in and have suggested or hinted at impropriety on numerous occasions – it could even be said that this is your default position or brand.


    Final Observations


    None of this is to say that Neurizon’s pathis guaranteed, or that shareholders shouldn’t ask difficult questions. But yourrecent posts tend to cast ambiguity as deception, pragmatism as betrayal, andstandard biotech operations as cause for alarm. That’s a pattern I encourageyou to reflect on.

    Reasonable scrutiny is vital. But when commentary becomes performative —leaning on emotional resonance rather than factual grounding — it risksundermining its own legitimacy.

    At the end of the day, we all want the same thing: for NUZ-001 to succeed, forpatients and families to benefit, and for the company to generate real andlasting value. To get there, the debate should stay tethered to evidence.


    Cheers


    Densy


    References:

    1. Neurizon Therapeutics – Q3 FY24Activities Report, ASX:NUZ, 29 April 2024
    2. Neurizon Therapeutics – Announcement of IND Clinical Hold, ASX:NUZ, 11 March2024
    3. PharmAust – Investor Presentation and Quarterly Activities Reports, Oct–Dec2022

    Last edited by Densy: Saturday, 20:37
 
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)
Last
17.0¢
Change
0.010(6.25%)
Mkt cap ! $83.69M
Open High Low Value Volume
16.5¢ 17.0¢ 16.5¢ $18.68K 110.9K

Buyers (Bids)

No. Vol. Price($)
1 6157 16.5¢
 

Sellers (Offers)

Price($) Vol. No.
17.0¢ 84773 1
View Market Depth
Last trade - 15.32pm 19/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ?
Last
17.0¢
  Change
0.010 ( 3.03 %)
Open High Low Volume
16.5¢ 17.0¢ 16.5¢ 55311
Last updated 12.20pm 19/06/2025 ?
NUZ (ASX) Chart
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.