How can a Director allow a tenement to lapse and then aquire it in a private company with some mates? is this not a conflict of interest in the least? or even a direct abuse of postion stealing from shareholders?
We want our tenements back!!!
20 largest shareholders hold 60% of the company which means that small shareholders comprise the other 40% We have a lot of influence if we all vote!
EVERYONE MUST VOTE!
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?