New thread as things get lost here. We have seen, based ona small sample set, that the IMU treatment has ~ 80% efficacy on patients that have failed to recover using other traditional treatment methods. Is it possible that the 20% who did not recover were in actual fact so severely organ damaged that no treamtment would have made them recover in any case? My thinking is that if IMU therapy were to be sued at earlier stages would it be able to achieve closer to 100% recovery?
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
28.5¢ |
Change
-0.010(3.39%) |
Mkt cap ! $84.31M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 30.0¢ | 30.0¢ | 28.0¢ | $136.2K | 469.9K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | 313164 | 28.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 28.5¢ | 157241 | 6 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 12.06pm 11/09/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| IMU (ASX) Chart |