ill be sounding like a parrot but ill put my opinion across anyway. this new ann i believe is in response to lenni email the other day it has all the quotes to counter it.
did you hear anything back lenni ?
it has all the little expressions/quotes on the bottom of each page some very informative info in them.
they sound like/write like in presentation that they have all the right intentions but - love the risks quote one controlling shareholder.
so the 17.6% of ARU did they only get that much because it was a project in AUS ?
would they of been rejected if they tried for 51% of ARU ?
how about the failed LYC bid massive upswing in value ?
how about the sp trading at 33c and not 40.5c ?
i cant figure that out!
it would be a cracker of a deal if it was for only 30%-40% of the company and ill vote yes to that!
OR 100% at $1
investor update, page-9
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
