Trying to identify the real story behind ASX returns: dividends, tax and inflation

  1. 3 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 2

    Australian investors often quote stock market performance in broad strokes - “about 8% a year” - but the truth is more nuanced. A new analysis of ASX returns over the past 20 years shows how dividends, inflation and tax treatment completely change the picture.

    Between April 2005 and April 2025, the ASX200 Price Index grew at just 3.89% per year. Strip out dividends, and the average Aussie stock portfolio barely kept ahead of inflation. But once dividends are reinvested, the story changes dramatically: the All Ordinaries Accumulation Index (AXJOA), which includes reinvested dividends, delivered a 7.96% compound annual growth rate (CAGR).

    That difference of more than 4% per year may not sound like much, but compounded over two decades, it’s the difference between doubling your wealth and merely treading water.

    $10,000 in term deposits at 3.35% → ~$18,500

    $10,000 in ASX200 price-only returns at 3.89% → ~$21,000

    $10,000 in ASX200 with dividends reinvested at 7.96% → ~$45,000

    The clear takeaway: dividends matter more than capital growth in Australia.

    Inflation Erodes the Picture

    Inflation quietly eats away at returns. Over the past 20 years, CPI averaged 2.74% per year. After adjusting for this, the real ASX200 total return was 5.13% per year. That still outpaces cash and term deposits, but the difference highlights how important it is to think in “real terms.”

    Looking at the most recent year (June 2024 to June 2025):

    ASX200 (price only): 3.78% nominal → 1.65% real

    AXJOA (with dividends): 5.02% nominal → 2.87% real

    Even modest inflation of 2% can halve the effective gain in purchasing power.

    Booms and Busts Shape Long-Term Results

    The long-term CAGR hides the fact that returns come in fits and starts:

    GFC (2008–09): The ASX200 lost more than half its value. Price-only investors waited years to break even, but dividend reinvestors recovered faster.

    Post-mining boom slowdown (2011–15): Capital growth was muted, but dividends kept compounding.

    COVID crash and rebound (2020–21): Markets fell 30% in weeks, then rebounded into one of the strongest five-year stretches ever, averaging 11.58% p.a. between 2020 and 2025.

    The lesson is clear: timing the market is nearly impossible, but staying invested and reinvesting dividends consistently pays off.

    Tax Considerations: Why Australian Returns Are Unique

    One reason Australian investors love dividends is the franking credit system. Unlike most countries, where dividends are taxed twice (once at the corporate level and again at the shareholder level), Australia’s imputation system allows investors to claim a credit for tax already paid by the company.

    How it works:

    A company earns $100 in profit and pays 30% company tax, leaving $70.

    It distributes that $70 as a “fully franked” dividend.

    The investor includes $100 in taxable income but also claims the $30 tax credit.

    For a retiree in a 0% tax bracket, the ATO actually refunds the full $30, boosting effective returns. For someone on a marginal tax rate of 32.5%, the franking credit offsets most of their liability, leaving only 2.5% additional tax.

    This system dramatically changes after-tax returns:

    Retirees and SMSFs in pension phase often receive tax-free income and full refunds of franking credits. Their effective after-tax return can be higher than the nominal return.

    High-income investors still benefit, but the franking credit only partially offsets their higher marginal tax rate.

    Put simply, a 5% dividend yield with full franking is worth more in Australia than the same 5% yield in the U.S. or New Zealand. And when you combine this with long-term stock market returns, the Australian tax system tilts the odds further in favour of patient, income-focused investors.

    How Australia Compares Globally

    The Australian market has been generous to income-focused investors, but less impressive on the global growth stage.

    USA (S&P 500): Over 20 years, the S&P 500 returned 10.3% nominal (7.53% real), far outpacing the ASX200. Much of this came from technology and growth sectors where U.S. companies reinvest profits rather than paying them out.

    New Zealand (NZX50): Price-only returns over 20 years were a meagre 0.02% nominal, translating to –2.65% real after inflation. Kiwi investors effectively lost money in real terms.

    The contrast highlights Australia’s reliance on dividend income and the unique tailwind of franking credits, which don’t exist in the U.S. and are weaker in New Zealand.

    What Investors Should Take Away

    Dividends are king in Australia. Over 50% of long-term ASX returns come from reinvested dividends, not capital gains.

    Inflation is the silent enemy. Always think in real terms - 8% nominal often means only 5% real.

    Tax matters. Franking credits make the ASX one of the most tax-efficient markets in the world for income investors, particularly retirees.

    Diversification helps. The ASX has underperformed the S&P 500 over decades. A mix of Australian dividend stocks and international growth exposure balances risk.

    What’s next?

    The average Aussie investor can’t control inflation or global market cycles. But two levers are firmly in their hands: reinvesting dividends and managing tax. Combined, these have been the real drivers of wealth on the ASX for the past 20 years.

    The big question now: with superannuation flows keeping demand strong and franking credits intact, will the next 10 years look more like the double-digit rebound of the 2020s, or the steady mid-single-digit grind of the last 20 years?

 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.