"the end of march hath come", page-90

tv105,

CDU sent in a EIS, but questions came back. This is entirely normal.

I can tell you that in a properly written, researched and coordinated EIS, most if not all of the issues will be known in advance by the consultants. Typically trivial issues such as labels on graphs wrong, or units on numbers perhaps some assumptions missing that need clarifying, and pretty much the problems are resolved.

What we might have is some quoll, blue tonged lizard or the rare but painful, hard arsed fighting ant that lives only in the presence of NCu.

To be crystal, the EIS was sent. Something came back and CDU have for whatever reason been endlessly delaying. No baying at the moon will change the fact that its CDU adding time to the process at the moment, not Bureaucrats.

Nothing happens about mining lease until the EIS responses are received by Govt, and they assess whether their initial questions were satisfactorily answered.

I don't buy that the problems at EXCO who presumably found answers are causing things to drag out. After all it is written responses, paper work after a bit of thinking and a few meetings surely? The fact its taking so long tells me something was incomplete in the first place.