ButcherBoy
" What steps has this foundry owner taken to reduce the carbon intesinty of his business? If the price of coal-fired electricity went up he might consider switching to renewable sources"
you do understand that the current carbon tax is intended to raise the carbon intensive energy to a point (ie price higher than now) where it is equivalent in price to those technologies which provide electricity with lower carbon intensity? ie by switching you don't save money! you only start saving when this price impost on carbon intensive energy continues to rise, at which point you have already gone out of business
the argument that prices are already rising, and thus people should be switching anyway is a bit misleading. a switch now still doesn't provide any marginal benefit until the cross over point between the costing of the two sources occurs in the medium term future. the tax is designed to push the price of electricity towards this point more rapidly, that is increase the price quicker to allow inefficient technology to be price competitive
simple really
- Forums
- Political Debate
- carbon tax - unintended consequences
carbon tax - unintended consequences, page-40
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 12 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
SER
STRATEGIC ENERGY RESOURCES LIMITED
David DeTata, Managing Director
David DeTata
Managing Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online