HT
I think a WACC of around 10% is right for OZL, which is essentially their Cost of Equity as they don't currently utilise debt.
Companies with a higher debt/equity ratio generally have a lower WACC, particularly those that engage the low rates on the European bond markets. The cost of debt should also be discounted by the corporate tax rate as it is a tax deductable expense.
Its a valid discussion as you point out the WACC used has a large bearing on the resulting NPV.
I agree with your other metrics used to calculate your $2.17 NPV.
I would buy a stock that is trading at a 35-40% discount to the derived NPV using this method. So for context OZL between $1.30-$1.40 would represent a sufficent discount to its NPV.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- OZL
- big c
big c, page-34
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 22 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add OZL (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non--Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non--Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online