Why would they risk our money when they can buy a proven Black Coal power station and burn 100% Coldry ?
"Because the Coldry tech is not proven on a commercial scale - hence why Arup must commence work ASAP."
Neither is the HRL technology, so again why should they risk our money?
HRL have jumping through hoop after hoop and it looks like the tribe has spoken when the major backer with drew funding
Do you think that HRL will be able to answer the questions below now ?
"(12)?? No. These performance levels will not be a condition of receiving grant payments. The key objective of the fund under which this project is supported is to demonstrate the commercial potential of new technologies or processes. The specific objective of this project is to demonstrate Integrated Drying Gasification Combined Cycle technology. Broader performance outcomes beyond the demonstration of the technology fall outside the scope of the recipient?s grant obligations."
http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;db=CHAMBER;id=chamber%2Fhansards%2F2009-02-03%2F0160;query=Id%3A%22chamber%2Fhansards%2F2009-02-03%2F0047%22
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
7.1¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $19.00M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 8146 | 7.1¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 7.0¢ | 12 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 12.24pm 19/09/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| ECT (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable