First thing should be done..I know it's a little pedantic..but as this is a SCIENTIFIC debate,and science is all ABOUT being accurate,facts, and maybe even about being pedantic...it should be called a carbon DIOXIDE tax,or debate or whatever.
Calling it a CARBON tax conjures up images of ingesting black stuff..I know it helps the fear campaigners...but it's an misleading beginning to the whole thing.
I know it's a whole another word..to say DIOXIDE but surely that's not too much of an imposition in a scientific debate which could change the course of our country's future.
Call it a CO2 debate..? but let's get away from the fundamental lie of carbon ..governments should not be allowed to be so lazy.And then,who knows..we may then choose to have a debate (or not) on the real question of an odorless,colorless gas which plant life thrives on.
For me,I think I'll pass altogether on disscusions of "carbon"
- Forums
- Political Debate
- cate blanchett
cate blanchett, page-130
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 6 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
SBW
SHEKEL BRAINWEIGH LTD
Dani Nadri, Country Manager Australia
Dani Nadri
Country Manager Australia
SPONSORED BY The Market Online