price, page-31

Callback

Your'e right, the legal battle in the first instance will be to the obtain Native Title...but after that is obtained and if GOT proceed with their "Project" there may well be appeals through the courts to get injunctions etc. etc.

Native Title will not give the right of veto in any case.

You continue to assert that the process of mapping the anthropology of the sea is moving the goalposts, essentially based on your own prejudices and biases. Why don't you find out where the goalposts are positioned at this point in time by reading Turner's stuff, I think that you might find that the goalposts are positioned exactly as I describe. In other words assess the facts as they stand at this point in time and then post your commentary.

And I'm more than aware that Gemco is involved in all of this.

I believe that the anti-mining sentiment will change, but not in this generation or the next generation. Any move by Gemco re their sea-based tenemnets, in my opinion, will entrench the anti mining sentiment at this point in time even further.

One of the reasons I keep posting here is to rebuff posters such as yourself who either attempt to put words into my mouth or deliberately misconstrue what I post to fit in with their own "wishing" that the situation is as they want it to be. Another reason I post is to deal with the stereotypical notions some posters appear to hold in regard to Ceremonial aborigines and also to address the misconceptions some appear to hold re the situation Groote.

Callback, post your dollars per tonne figure supporting your argument that sea bed mining of mn is financially viable at this point in time. You described what you believed the process to be but never linked it to costs.

I notice that you haven't taken up my offer of posting as to your opinion re the recent so called acquisition...avoiding as you often do discussing those issues which question GOT's credibility.