hmmmm.
if the capex and opex has doubled, but the pfs is based only on the southern end of hardstaff, ie: half of the deposit, then wouldnt the addition of the rest of hardstaff half the opex and capex and bring them back in line with published expectations?
phase 2 is simply the mine running as intended, for 10yrs (Phase 1) x 2. that is: a mine life of 20 yrs at $40 tonne opex.
am i way off track here?
oh yeah, im gutted but still maintain fully my belief in the project.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- PLV
- fundamentals consideration
fundamentals consideration, page-50
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 30 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add PLV (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Alex Hanly, CEO
Alex Hanly
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online