911 - postscript......, page-120

  1. 7,453 Posts.
    grahod,you love giving youself a rap dude dont you lol lol
    you ve got yourself really impressed!

    in november 1989,father ignacio martin-baro
    a social psychologist,delivered a speach in california on the psychological consequences of political terror.

    In his speach,martin-baro gave a much more precise definition of terrorism,one that is ignored only at great peril.


    He (martin baro )stressed several relevant points.first,the most significant form of terrorism,by a large measure,is state terrorism-that is,"terrorizing the whole population through systematic actions carried out by the forces of the state".

    Second,such terrorism, is an essential part of a government-imposed sociopolitical project,designed for the needs of the privileged.

    Disturbing though it may be,martin baro s is one validated by history.The majority of terrorism throughout history has found its sponsors in the hallowed halls of officialdom,in the entity known as government.Terrorism is surrogate warfare,a manufactured crisis designed to induce social change.

    Its combatants consciously or unconsciously wage the war on behalf of higher powers with higher agendas. whether its adherants are aware of it or not,terrorism always serves the ambitions of another.

    In his article "fake terror:the road to dictatorship",micheal rivero states that"its the oldest trick in the book,dating back to roman times,creating the enemies you need"(p1)

    The strategy is quite simple,individuals create a crisis so that they can introduce their desired solution.
    Terrorism is being used to keep the rabble in line on behalf of an elite that wishes to maintain and expand its power.

    In the power of the elite,sociologist c.wright mills introduces these powers(p3-4)
    the power elite is composed of men whose positions enable them to transcend the ordinary environments of ordinary men and women ,they are in positions to make decisions having major consequences.

    whether they do or do not make such decisions is less important than the fact that they occupy such pivital positions:their failure to make decisions,is itself an act that is often of greater consequence than the decisions they do make.for they are in command of the major heirachies and organisations of modern societty.they rule big corporations.

    They run the machinery of the state and claim its parogatives.They direct the military establishment.They occupy the strategic command posts of the social structure,in which are now centered the effective means of the power and the wealth and the celebrity which they enjoy.
    Talk of oligarchs might tend to conjure pictures of mediaeval feudal lords.however,a FEDERAL RESERVE study
    points out elitism being alive and well and existing in the land of the free.In his secrets of the temple ,former washington post editor william greider quotes the study(p39)
    54%of the total net financial assets were held by2%of the families with the greatest amount of such assets and 86%
    by the top 10%,55%of the families in the sample had 0 or negative net worth ..

    The concerntration of wealth in so few hands certainly suggests there is a ruling class.It is highly naive to believe that this ruling elite does not weild a great deal of influence over civilisation.

    In her book ,beyond the ruling class :strategic elites in modern society professor suzanne Keller states(p3)

    THE NOTION OF THE STRATUM ELEVATED ABOVE THE MASS OF MEN MAY PROMPT APPROVAL ,INDIFFERENCE,OR DESPAIR,BUT REGARDLESS OF HOW MEN FEEL ABOUT IT,THE FACT REMAINS THAT THEIR LIVES,FORTUNES,AND FATE ARE AND LONG HAVE BEEN DEPENDENT ON WHAT A SMALL NUMBER OF MEN IN HIGH PLACES THINK AND DO

    this grahod,my fine fury friend is exactly what happened
    sept 11 2001

    dick cheney,donald rumsfeld these puppets of the elite played massive parts in sept11,
    nothing happens for nothing

 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.