response from dave sammut, page-29

Hi again 3500.
I don't believe Veeone is displaying or encouraging a passive attitude. Just stating facts.
As for your statement,
"This stands true specially when managemement don't hold a significant equity & they don't have a "buddy" like LJC to keep them in their positions". I would argue this as I know of at least one company whose CEO/directors held a substantial holding and sold out before the proverbial hit the fan. These shareholders have or are doing their darn best to see their company possibly re-list and see some of their money returned. But I tell you that from where I sit it does not look promising to me. You say we have power. which might be true to some degree but I think that the type of power your talking about you'd probably have to have at least triple your current holding. I also like the "before we get more pro-active". Do you you have a cadre of people lined up willing to do your bidding or is this just wishful thinking that there is a whole lot of agreeing shareholders out here on the forum ready to pounce on Intec's management. And yes Rome wasn't built in a day but I bet it collapsed a whole lot faster than what it took to build.

My sentiment is posted as none, not because I think management are not doing their job but because as stated in Dave's last reply that decision and timing is not in Intecs hands. And (my take)with the way I'm seeing things globally and economically I wouldn't be at all surprised if projects either get delayed or put off indefinetly. You can't force or expect companies to take up technologies in this current climate.

Lastly, you are not upsetting me but it is becoming monotonous. Lots of accusations lots of bluff and bluster but no definitive arguements or plans.

Hope you take this in the spirit of friendly forum banter/discussion and not as a direct attack on you personally. When I can see constructive critisism and suggestions I'll review my stance.

Cheers
tweaty2