-science has a weakness as it often thinks it knows too much Strawman
-the "snapshot" we have of climate since humans charted such things is too small and incomplete to base too much upon OK, what is this 'snapshot' whos basing what on it?
-that the very existence human component is debatable lol, humans exist dude...
-the impact of human influence is even more debatable true
-the costs associated with mitigating human influence are astronomical HUGE, better do something(stop actions) now before it's worse
-we're still nowhere near sure indeed warming is a bad thing seeing a hell of a lot more will die if its colder
yeah nah...
-what science i do have demands I test my hypotheses against outcomes and reject hypotheses in light of such examination OK good on you...
-that the above process has been aborted in the genre of AGW study bare assertion, evidence please.
-and that debate per se on an informed level and in the public domain is being stifled
Not it's not lol, how many climate conferences have been done?
