Jake, for starters Beach have not committed to spend $14.25 mill. As I read it assuming the well costs $16 mill, Beach will spend 80% of that (Beach and Icons share) less the $1.75 mill contribution by Icon (total $11.05 mill), $6.4 mill of which is their share anyway (net benefit to Icon of $4.65 mill).
Regarding the previous deal, as I read it (and like I said I may be wrong) that was $8.5 mill net to Icon. Here is part of the announcement, people can make up their own mind.
Icon Announcement 26 October 2009
Beach can earn up to a 40% interest for an up to 8.5 m commitment.
In the first stage of the farmin a 25% interest in ATP 855P will be acquired by Beach Petroleum by contributing 80% of the cost of seismic reprocessing and the acquisition of an additional 300 kms of 2D seismic.
The remainder of the seismic costs will be borne by the existing 20% interest holders in ATP 855P.
Beach have the option to earn a further 15% by contributing to Icons participating interest share of the drilling costs up to 7 million.
Mr James said "at current costs for seismic data gathering, the total farmin would be valued at 8.5 m."
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- ICN
- its actually a win!
its actually a win!, page-12
Featured News
Add ICN (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.6¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $4.608M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
ICN (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable