Yes, I rather feel that Mockton did win handsomely, but then I am a skeptic that the so called scientific community is any more advanced than the middle ages Catholic church, with its murder and burning of so called heretics who actually read the Bible and called their bluff. Until recently it was total heresy in the scientific crowd, so called to be a "catastrophist". Such people were regarded as beyond the pale. In fact it was the reverse, and the whole scientific community was exposed as a pack of fools for conforming this dogma. How? Look at the Moon. Look at the craters on it. If this planet collides with anything it is travelling at 66,000 miles an hour or 120,000ks an hour, around the Sun, it has a Specific Gravity of 5.5 which is denser that solid iron, so if it collides with anything substantial it will be one HELL OF A BANG. And has been 81 times more often than the Moon has been hit, approximately, based on probability based on the relative sizes of the two bodies. This planet goes into train wreck mode on is surface quite frequently. Yet the whole so called scientfic community was totally dogmatic about gradualism-you know, the Darwin theology. Brilliant scientists? No, er D U R, people. Then we had all the IT mob's consensus about the year 2000 bug, remember that? Total garbage.Nothing happened. But they got heaps of money out of it. The medical profession refused to wash its hands for many decades after germs were discovered. Oh no, we're doctors we couldnt carry infection, we are too wonderful. Millions of people died especially in hospitals as a result, from infection carried by these hands but it took a world war and a desperate shortage of troops to finally get them to wash. Dont talk to me of "consensus", all it often means is pompous pretension, and consiracy against the public. Money is usually the reason. When you hear them raving on about that reach for the rotten fruit and tomatoes and start throwing.
